> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2024 1:15 PM
> To: tho...@monjalon.net; dev@dpdk.org; david.march...@redhat.com
> Cc: step...@networkplumber.org; Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
> <pbhagavat...@marvell.com>; sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH v2 2/3] examples/l2fwd-event: fix spinlock
> handling
>
> Detected by pvs-studio Bug 89-93: very suspicious synchronization The analyzer
> issued a pack of V1020 warnings that a resource might remain blocked. Fixes:
> 080f57bceca4 ("examples/l2fwd-event: add eventdev main loop") Cc:
> pbhagavatula@ marvell. com
> Detected by pvs-studio
> Bug 89-93: very suspicious synchronization The analyzer issued a pack of V1020
> warnings that a resource might remain blocked.
>
> Fixes: 080f57bceca4 ("examples/l2fwd-event: add eventdev main loop")
> Cc: pbhagavat...@marvell.com
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>
1/3 and 3/3 are NOT eventdev patches. So I Applied 2/3 to
dpdk-next-eventdev/for-main and delegated 1/3 and 3/3 to Thomas.
> ---
> examples/l2fwd-event/l2fwd_event.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/examples/l2fwd-event/l2fwd_event.c b/examples/l2fwd-
> event/l2fwd_event.c
> index 22472027b9..416957384b 100644
> --- a/examples/l2fwd-event/l2fwd_event.c
> +++ b/examples/l2fwd-event/l2fwd_event.c
> @@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ l2fwd_get_free_event_port(struct
> l2fwd_event_resources *evt_rsrc)
> rte_spinlock_lock(&evt_rsrc->evp.lock);
> if (index >= evt_rsrc->evp.nb_ports) {
> printf("No free event port is available\n");
> + rte_spinlock_unlock(&evt_rsrc->evp.lock);
> return -1;
> }
>
> --
> 2.25.1
