Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] relicense various bits of the dpdk

2018-02-06 Thread Thomas Monjalon
01/02/2018 13:49, Hemant Agrawal: > On 2/1/2018 5:49 PM, Neil Horman wrote: > > Received a note the other day from the Linux Foundation governance board > > for DPDK indicating that several files I have copyright on need to be > > relicensed to be compliant with the DPDK licensing guidelines. I ha

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] doc: convert Intel license headers to SPDX tags

2018-02-06 Thread Thomas Monjalon
01/02/2018 18:18, Ferruh Yigit: > Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit > Acked-by: Bruce Richardson Applied, thanks

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] doc: convert Intel sharing license headers to SPDX tags

2018-02-06 Thread Thomas Monjalon
06/02/2018 17:09, Kovacevic, Marko: > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] doc: convert Intel sharing license headers to > > SPDX tags > > > > Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit > > Acked-by: Bruce Richardson > > Acked-by: Marko Kovacevic Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon Applied, thanks

[dpdk-dev] [dpdk-announce] release candidate 18.02-rc3

2018-02-06 Thread Thomas Monjalon
A new DPDK release candidate is ready for testing: http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/tag/?id=v18.02-rc3 The release notes have been updated: http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_18_02.html What's new in RC3? - only bug fixes The next release candidate is expected to inc

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/bnxt: fix packet type

2018-02-06 Thread Ajit Khaparde
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 9:07 AM, Olivier Matz wrote: > The hw flags are not read correctly: the defines > RX_PKT_CMPL_FLAGS_ITYPE_* are not bits but values, so the should not be > tested with if (value & X) but with if ((value & MASK) == X). > This was resulting in a wrong packet type. > > For ins

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/bnxt: fix Rx checksum flags

2018-02-06 Thread Ajit Khaparde
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 5:39 AM, Olivier Matz wrote: > Fix the Rx offload flags when the IP or L4 checksum is seen as incorrect > by the hardware. In this case, the proper value is PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_BAD. > > PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_NONE means that the checksum may be incorrect in the > packet headers, but t

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] net/bnxt: add 100G speed config capability

2018-02-06 Thread Ajit Khaparde
We are not parsing for 100G speed correctly. With this patch we should be able to configure 100G link. Fixes 710d3bd5568d: ("net/bnxt: add 100G speed detection") Cc: sta...@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Ajit Khaparde --- drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c | 8 +++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 del

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] net/bnxt: update bnxt feature list

2018-02-06 Thread Ajit Khaparde
Updating bnxt.ini file. Signed-off-by: Ajit Khaparde --- doc/guides/nics/features/bnxt.ini | 6 ++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/features/bnxt.ini b/doc/guides/nics/features/bnxt.ini index 9ddce0d4a..a534e3063 100644 --- a/doc/guides/nics/features/bnxt.ini ++

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] net/bnxt: fix link speed setting with autoneg off

2018-02-06 Thread Ajit Khaparde
When Autoneg is turned off especially on remote side, link does not come up. This patch fixes that. Fixes: 7bc8e9a227cc ("net/bnxt: support async link notification") Cc: sta...@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Ajit Khaparde --- drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt.h | 1 + drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c | 22 ++

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] bnxt patchset

2018-02-06 Thread Ajit Khaparde
Patchset against dpdk-next-net. Please apply. Ajit Khaparde (4): net/bnxt: update bnxt feature list net/bnxt: fix link speed setting with autoneg off net/bnxt: add 100G speed config capability net/bnxt: fix an incorrect return in mac_addr_add doc/guides/nics/features/bnxt.ini | 6 ++

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] net/bnxt: fix an incorrect return in mac_addr_add

2018-02-06 Thread Ajit Khaparde
There is no need to return an error if an existing MAC is added. Fixes: 778b759ba10e ("net/bnxt: add MAC address") Cc: sta...@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Ajit Khaparde --- drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: dump flow create error message

2018-02-06 Thread Nélio Laranjeiro
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 02:20:28PM +, Xueming(Steven) Li wrote: > Hi Nelio, > > > -Original Message- > > From: Nélio Laranjeiro [mailto:nelio.laranje...@6wind.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2018 9:22 PM > > To: Xueming(Steven) Li > > Cc: Nelio Laranjeiro ; dev@dpdk.org; Shahaf >

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/7] cxgbe: add support to update RSS hash configuration and key

2018-02-06 Thread Rahul Lakkireddy
On Tuesday, February 02/06/18, 2018 at 16:08:35 +0530, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 06/02/2018 11:11, Ferruh Yigit: > > On 2/6/2018 9:22 AM, Rahul Lakkireddy wrote: > > > On Monday, February 02/05/18, 2018 at 22:39:55 +0530, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > > >> I tend to get driver patches even after integration

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/ppc64: revert implement arch-specific TSC freq query

2018-02-06 Thread Chao Zhu
> -Original Message- > From: Gowrishankar [mailto:gowrishanka...@linux.vnet.ibm.com] > Sent: 2018年1月30日 16:59 > To: dev@dpdk.org > Cc: Chao Zhu ; tho...@monjalon.net; > Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan > Subject: [PATCH] eal/ppc64: revert implement arch-specific TSC freq query > > From: Gowri

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/ppc64: revert implement arch-specific TSC freq query

2018-02-06 Thread Chao Zhu
The previous patch has some misunderstanding of the the TSC frequency counting. I support this. > -Original Message- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net] > Sent: 2018年2月1日 8:30 > To: Gowrishankar ; Chao Zhu > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/ppc64:

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] doc: add a user guidance document for igb

2018-02-06 Thread Zhang, Helin
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Mcnamara, John > Sent: Monday, February 5, 2018 5:35 PM > To: Zhao1, Wei; dev@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] doc: add a user guidance document for igb > > > > > -Original Message- > > Fro

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/ppc64: revert implement arch-specific TSC freq query

2018-02-06 Thread Thomas Monjalon
07/02/2018 08:05, Chao Zhu: > The previous patch has some misunderstanding of the the TSC frequency > counting. > I support this. Chao, it is very late in the release cycle. Do you want to take the risk of applying this patch in 18.02-rc4? If you discover a bug in this patch next week, it will be

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] doc: update flow filtering document

2018-02-06 Thread Zhao1, Wei
Ok, I will check that. Thanks. > -Original Message- > From: Mcnamara, John > Sent: Monday, February 5, 2018 11:31 PM > To: Yigit, Ferruh ; Zhao1, Wei > ; dev@dpdk.org > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org; or...@mellanox.com > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] doc: update flow filtering document > > >

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/ppc64: revert implement arch-specific TSC freq query

2018-02-06 Thread Chao Zhu
Thomas, I think it's OK to apply this patch now. It's been verified before and it's important for the correctness of the cycle counting on POWER. Thank you! > -Original Message- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net] > Sent: 2018年2月7日 15:26 > To: Chao Zhu > Cc: 'Gowrishan

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix issue during customized info update

2018-02-06 Thread Wu, Jingjing
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Beilei Xing > Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2018 3:53 PM > To: Zhang, Qi Z > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Chilikin, Andrey ; > sta...@dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix issue during customized info update >

<    1   2