On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 12:57 AM, Ananda Sathyanarayana <
ananda at versa-networks.com> wrote:
> Looks like the above patch is not accepted by the DPDK community yet. Any
> specific reason ?
>
primary reason seems to be because the patch was not in correct format and
e1000 had no maintainer iden
On 10/20/2016 11:37 AM, Jan Blunck wrote:
> This adds infrastructure for drivers to allow being requested by an alias
> so that a renamed driver can still get loaded by its legacy name.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck
> ---
> lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_vdev.c | 8
> lib/librte_eal
Hi,
Thanks Dave for the report.
I suggest to continue on the new mailing list:
moving at dpdk.org
Please register if you are interested in the structure move:
http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/moving
2016-10-21 15:00, Dave Neary:
> Hi all,
>
> We had a great session yesterday on this
3 matches
Mail list logo