On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 12:57 AM, Ananda Sathyanarayana < ananda at versa-networks.com> wrote:
> Looks like the above patch is not accepted by the DPDK community yet. Any > specific reason ? > primary reason seems to be because the patch was not in correct format and e1000 had no maintainer identified. since the latter is now there, the former can be resent ? ?-- thanks anupam? -- In the beginning was the lambda, and the lambda was with Emacs, and Emacs was the lambda.
