[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4 v2] vhost: fix wrong usage of eventfd_t

2015-09-27 Thread Yuanhan Liu
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 02:44:11PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-09-24 22:01, Yuanhan Liu: > > Would you consider to apply these 4 patches please? The 4th patch > > affects quite many lines of code, and the sooner we apply it, the > > fewer chance it will introduce conflicts for later patche

[dpdk-dev] Having troubles binding an SR-IOV VF to uio_pci_generic on Amazon instance

2015-09-27 Thread Vlad Zolotarov
Hi, I was trying to use uio_pci_generic with Intel's 10G SR-IOV devices on Amazon EC2 instances with Enhanced Networking enabled. The idea is to create a DPDK environment that doesn't require compiling kernel modules (igb_uio). However I was surprised to discover that uio_pci_generic refuses to w

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Fix VMware emulated e1000 doesn't support INTX_DISABLE flag

2015-09-27 Thread Kirill A. Korinsky
When you try to run any DPDK-app in VMWare with e1000/82545EM NIC you have a lot of lines like: EAL: Error reading from file descriptor 9: Input/output error The reason of this error is bad INTX emulation in VMWare and pci_intx_mask_supported return false every time. --- lib/librte_eal/linuxap

[dpdk-dev] Having troubles binding an SR-IOV VF to uio_pci_generic on Amazon instance

2015-09-27 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 10:05:11AM +0300, Vlad Zolotarov wrote: > Hi, > I was trying to use uio_pci_generic with Intel's 10G SR-IOV devices on > Amazon EC2 instances with Enhanced Networking enabled. > The idea is to create a DPDK environment that doesn't require compiling > kernel modules (igb_uio

[dpdk-dev] Having troubles binding an SR-IOV VF to uio_pci_generic on Amazon instance

2015-09-27 Thread Vladislav Zolotarov
On Sep 27, 2015 12:43 PM, "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 10:05:11AM +0300, Vlad Zolotarov wrote: > > Hi, > > I was trying to use uio_pci_generic with Intel's 10G SR-IOV devices on > > Amazon EC2 instances with Enhanced Networking enabled. > > The idea is to create a DPDK e

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4 v2] vhost: fix wrong usage of eventfd_t

2015-09-27 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2015-09-27 08:17, Yuanhan Liu: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 02:44:11PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > - make the first email the child of the previous version > > I'm wondering how could you do that, with git-send-email. It can be checked in http://dpdk.org/dev#send: --in-reply-to The m

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Fix VMware emulated e1000 doesn't support INTX_DISABLE flag

2015-09-27 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 12:51:06 +0400 "Kirill A. Korinsky" wrote: > When you try to run any DPDK-app in VMWare with e1000/82545EM NIC > you have a lot of lines like: > > EAL: Error reading from file descriptor 9: Input/output error > > The reason of this error is bad INTX emulation in VMWare > a

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] add vector PMD RX for FVL

2015-09-27 Thread Ananyev, Konstantin
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zhe Tao > Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2015 6:05 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] add vector PMD RX for FVL > > The vPMD RX function uses the multi-buffer and SSE instructions to > acc

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ixgbe: prefetch packet headers in vector PMD receive function

2015-09-27 Thread Ananyev, Konstantin
> -Original Message- > From: Zoltan Kiss [mailto:zoltan.kiss at linaro.org] > Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 7:29 PM > To: Richardson, Bruce; dev at dpdk.org > Cc: Ananyev, Konstantin > Subject: Re: [PATCH] ixgbe: prefetch packet headers in vector PMD receive > function > > On 07/09/1

[dpdk-dev] GPL/LGPL .vs BSD license

2015-09-27 Thread Jim Thompson
The following files have LGPL or GPL licenses. I can see the libretto_eal and the four files that are part of DTS being GPL, but there others seem like a mistake. Especially the docs, and the presence of the LICENSE.LGPL file. Is it possible to clean these up and make them BSD licensed? Jim

[dpdk-dev] GPL/LGPL .vs BSD license

2015-09-27 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 20:44:41 -0500 Jim Thompson wrote: > The following files have LGPL or GPL licenses. I can see the libretto_eal > and the four files that are part of DTS being GPL, but there others seem like > a mistake. > Especially the docs, and the presence of the LICENSE.LGPL file. >