Hi, I was trying to use uio_pci_generic with Intel's 10G SR-IOV devices on Amazon EC2 instances with Enhanced Networking enabled. The idea is to create a DPDK environment that doesn't require compiling kernel modules (igb_uio). However I was surprised to discover that uio_pci_generic refuses to work with EN device on AWS:
$ lspci 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 440FX - 82441FX PMC [Natoma] (rev 02) 00:01.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation 82371SB PIIX3 ISA [Natoma/Triton II] 00:01.1 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82371SB PIIX3 IDE [Natoma/Triton II] 00:01.3 Bridge: Intel Corporation 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ACPI (rev 01) 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Cirrus Logic GD 5446 00:03.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599 Ethernet Controller Virtual Function (rev 01) 00:04.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599 Ethernet Controller Virtual Function (rev 01) 00:1f.0 Unassigned class [ff80]: XenSource, Inc. Xen Platform Device (rev 01) $ sudo ./dpdk/tools/dpdk_nic_bind.py -b uio_pci_generic 00:04.0 Error: bind failed for 0000:00:04.0 - Cannot bind to driver uio_pci_generic $dmesg --> snip <--- [ 816.655575] uio_pci_generic 0000:00:04.0: No IRQ assigned to device: no support for interrupts? $ sudo lspci -s 00:04.0 -vvv 00:04.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599 Ethernet Controller Virtual Function (rev 01) Physical Slot: 4 Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx- Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx- Region 0: Memory at f3008000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=16K] Region 3: Memory at f300c000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=16K] Capabilities: [70] MSI-X: Enable- Count=3 Masked- Vector table: BAR=3 offset=00000000 PBA: BAR=3 offset=00002000 Kernel modules: ixgbevf So, as we may see the PCI device doesn't have an INTX interrupt line assigned indeed. It has an MSI-X capability however. Looking at the uio_pci_generic code it seems to require the INTX: uio_pci_generic.c: line 74: probe(): if (!pdev->irq) { dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "No IRQ assigned to device: " "no support for interrupts?\n"); pci_disable_device(pdev); return -ENODEV; } Is it a known limitation? Michael, could u, pls., comment on this? thanks, vlad