To: Michael Lilja
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Finn Christensen ; Bent Kuhre
>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> 20/04/2020 07:05, Michael Lilja:
> > Actually the open-source driver development has been on hold until
> just recently, due to other prio
Hi Michael,
20/04/2020 07:05, Michael Lilja:
> Actually the open-source driver development has been on hold until just
> recently, due to other priorities. We just recently allocated a new team to
> do the open source driver, a team of people who has not been working with
> DPDK before, so the
> -Original Message-
> From: Neil Horman
> Sent: 19. april 2020 23:16
> To: Michael Lilja
> Cc: Thomas Monjalon ; Finn Christensen
> ; dev@dpdk.org; Bent Kuhre ;
> techbo...@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 04:38:4
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 04:38:42AM +, Michael Lilja wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Neil Horman
> > Sent: 17. april 2020 04:55
> > To: Thomas Monjalon
> > Cc: Finn Christensen ; dev@dpdk.org; Bent Kuhre
> > ; Michael Lilja ; techbo...
> -Original Message-
> From: Neil Horman
> Sent: 17. april 2020 04:55
> To: Thomas Monjalon
> Cc: Finn Christensen ; dev@dpdk.org; Bent Kuhre
> ; Michael Lilja ; techbo...@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:07:12PM +
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:07:12PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 31/03/2020 21:56, Neil Horman:
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 02:29:08PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 31/03/2020 14:17, Neil Horman:
> > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 01:25:25PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > >
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:07:12PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 31/03/2020 21:56, Neil Horman:
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 02:29:08PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 31/03/2020 14:17, Neil Horman:
> > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 01:25:25PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > >
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 09:59:27PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 31/03/2020 21:51, Neil Horman:
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 07:58:45AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 12:39:17 +
> > > Michael Lilja wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I appreciate the discussi
31/03/2020 21:56, Neil Horman:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 02:29:08PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 31/03/2020 14:17, Neil Horman:
> > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 01:25:25PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Raising this topic again.
> > > >
> > > > As said in the past, it
31/03/2020 21:51, Neil Horman:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 07:58:45AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 12:39:17 +
> > Michael Lilja wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I appreciate the discussion. It would of course be nice if vendors could
> > > be allowed to use external
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 02:29:08PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 31/03/2020 14:17, Neil Horman:
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 01:25:25PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Raising this topic again.
> > >
> > > As said in the past, it is better to have this PMD inside DPDK.
> > >
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 07:58:45AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 12:39:17 +
> Michael Lilja wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I appreciate the discussion. It would of course be nice if vendors could be
> > allowed to use external libraries/drivers and have a DPDK shim but I a
On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 12:39:17 +
Michael Lilja wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I appreciate the discussion. It would of course be nice if vendors could be
> allowed to use external libraries/drivers and have a DPDK shim but I also
> understand the concern.
>
> We have started the movement towards an open
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: 31. marts 2020 14:45
> To: Michael Lilja
> Cc: Neil Horman ; Finn Christensen
> ; dev@dpdk.org; Bent Kuhre
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd
>
> 31/03/2020 14:39, Michael Lilja:
> > Hi,
> &
31/03/2020 14:39, Michael Lilja:
> Hi,
>
> I appreciate the discussion. It would of course be nice if vendors could be
> allowed to use external libraries/drivers and have a DPDK shim but I also
> understand the concern.
>
> We have started the movement towards an open source variant of our NIC
; dev@dpdk.org; Bent Kuhre
> ; Michael Lilja ; techbo...@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd
>
> 31/03/2020 14:17, Neil Horman:
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 01:25:25PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Raising this topic again
31/03/2020 14:17, Neil Horman:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 01:25:25PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Raising this topic again.
> >
> > As said in the past, it is better to have this PMD inside DPDK.
> > We discussed some concerns, but I think the consensus was to integrate
> > Napate
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 01:25:25PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Raising this topic again.
>
> As said in the past, it is better to have this PMD inside DPDK.
> We discussed some concerns, but I think the consensus was to integrate
> Napatech PMD anyway.
>
> I am sad that you did not f
Hi,
Raising this topic again.
As said in the past, it is better to have this PMD inside DPDK.
We discussed some concerns, but I think the consensus was to integrate
Napatech PMD anyway.
I am sad that you did not feel welcome enough to follow up with patches
during all these years.
Please would y
10/01/2018 01:19, Neil Horman:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 09:36:03PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 09/01/2018 21:20, Neil Horman:
> > > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 07:57:50PM +, Michael Lilja wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 04:15:47PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > > > Hi,
> > >
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 09:36:03PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 09/01/2018 21:20, Neil Horman:
> > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 07:57:50PM +, Michael Lilja wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 04:15:47PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > 08/01/2018 14:08, Finn Chri
09/01/2018 21:20, Neil Horman:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 07:57:50PM +, Michael Lilja wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 04:15:47PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > 08/01/2018 14:08, Finn Christensen:
> > > > > Hi Thomas,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for bringing this di
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 07:57:50PM +, Michael Lilja wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 04:15:47PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > 08/01/2018 14:08, Finn Christensen:
> > > > Hi Thomas,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for bringing this discussion up again.
> > > >
> > > > The Napatech
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 04:15:47PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 08/01/2018 14:08, Finn Christensen:
> > > Hi Thomas,
> > >
> > > Thanks for bringing this discussion up again.
> > >
> > > The Napatech PMD is build on top of our proprietary driver. The
> reason is basically that we
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 04:15:47PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 08/01/2018 14:08, Finn Christensen:
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > Thanks for bringing this discussion up again.
> >
> > The Napatech PMD is build on top of our proprietary driver. The reason is
> > basically that we utilize man
>-Original Message-
>From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
>Sent: 8. januar 2018 16:16
>To: Finn Christensen
>Cc: dev@dpdk.org
>Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd
>
>Hi,
>
>08/01/2018 14:08, Finn Christensen:
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>&
On Mon, 08 Jan 2018 16:15:47 +0100
Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 08/01/2018 14:08, Finn Christensen:
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > Thanks for bringing this discussion up again.
> >
> > The Napatech PMD is build on top of our proprietary driver. The reason is
> > basically that we utilize many yea
Hi,
08/01/2018 14:08, Finn Christensen:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Thanks for bringing this discussion up again.
>
> The Napatech PMD is build on top of our proprietary driver. The reason is
> basically that we utilize many years of driver development and thus reuses
> the FPGA controlling code in the D
28 matches
Mail list logo
