On 6/25/2021 2:26 PM, Igor Ryzhov wrote:
> Hi Ferruh, all,
>
> Let's please discuss another approach to setting KNI link status before
> making this API stable:
> http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20190925093623.18419-1-iryz...@nfware.com/
>
> I explained the problem with the current imp
Hi Ferruh, all,
Let's please discuss another approach to setting KNI link status before
making this API stable:
http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20190925093623.18419-1-iryz...@nfware.com/
I explained the problem with the current implementation there.
More than that, using ioctl approach
Sounds more than reasonable, +1 from me.
Ray K
On 24/06/2021 14:24, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 6/24/2021 11:42 AM, Kinsella, Ray wrote:
>> Hi Ferruh,
>>
>> The following kni experimental symbols are present in both v21.05 and v19.11
>> release. These symbols should be considered for promotion to
On 6/24/2021 11:42 AM, Kinsella, Ray wrote:
> Hi Ferruh,
>
> The following kni experimental symbols are present in both v21.05 and v19.11
> release. These symbols should be considered for promotion to stable as part
> of the v22 ABI in DPDK 21.11, as they have been experimental for >= 2yrs at
4 matches
Mail list logo