Hi Ferruh, all, Let's please discuss another approach to setting KNI link status before making this API stable: http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20190925093623.18419-1-iryz...@nfware.com/
I explained the problem with the current implementation there. More than that, using ioctl approach makes it possible to set also speed and duplex and use them to implement get_link_ksettings callback. I can send patches for both features. Igor On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 4:54 PM Kinsella, Ray <m...@ashroe.eu> wrote: > Sounds more than reasonable, +1 from me. > > Ray K > > On 24/06/2021 14:24, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > > On 6/24/2021 11:42 AM, Kinsella, Ray wrote: > >> Hi Ferruh, > >> > >> The following kni experimental symbols are present in both v21.05 and > v19.11 release. These symbols should be considered for promotion to stable > as part of the v22 ABI in DPDK 21.11, as they have been experimental for >= > 2yrs at this point. > >> > >> * rte_kni_update_link > >> > >> Ray K > >> > > > > Hi Ray, > > > > Thanks for follow up. > > > > I just checked the API and planning a small behavior update to it. > > If the update is accepted, I suggest keeping the API experimental for > 21.08 too, > > but can mature it on v21.11. > > > > Thanks, > > ferruh > > >
