Hi all,
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org]
> Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2017 9:02 AM
> To: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Cc: Ilya Matveychikov ; dev@dpdk.org; Hu, Jiayu
>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] A question about GRO nei
> On Dec 7, 2017, at 5:01 AM, Stephen Hemminger
> wrote:
>
> Ok, went RFC hunting and the relevant one seems to be RFC 6864.
> It mandates unique id's for each datagram so TCP does send them.
>
>
Thanks for mention such the RFC, never heard about it.
dev@dpdk.org; Hu, Jiayu
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] A question about GRO neighbor packet matching
> >
> > On Wed, 6 Dec 2017 22:38:12 +0400
> > Ilya Matveychikov wrote:
> >
> > > > On Dec 6, 2017, at 10:12 PM, Stephen Hemminger
> > > &
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger
> Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 11:16 PM
> To: Ilya Matveychikov
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Hu, Jiayu
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] A question about GRO neighbor packet matching
On Wed, 6 Dec 2017 22:38:12 +0400
Ilya Matveychikov wrote:
> > On Dec 6, 2017, at 10:12 PM, Stephen Hemminger
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 6 Dec 2017 18:02:21 +0400
> > Ilya Matveychikov wrote:
> >
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >>
> >> My question is about neighbor packet matching algorithm for T
> On Dec 6, 2017, at 10:12 PM, Stephen Hemminger
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 6 Dec 2017 18:02:21 +0400
> Ilya Matveychikov wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>>
>> My question is about neighbor packet matching algorithm for TCP. Is it
>> correct to expect that IP packets should have continuous ID enumerat
On Wed, 6 Dec 2017 18:02:21 +0400
Ilya Matveychikov wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
> My question is about neighbor packet matching algorithm for TCP. Is it
> correct to expect that IP packets should have continuous ID enumeration
> (i.e. iph-next.id = iph-prev.id + 1)?
No.
> ~~~
> lib/librte_gro/gr
7 matches
Mail list logo
