Hi Alex,
>
> Hi Konstantin.
>
> Could we please make a final decision about counting mbufs, since It still
> feels to me like an unfinished business?
> Below are my final argumens. if they are not sound to you, just nack ;)
Sorry, but as I said before - not sure that it really worth it.
Still
Hi Konstantin.
Could we please make a final decision about counting mbufs, since It still
feels to me like an unfinished business?
Below are my final argumens. if they are not sound to you, just nack ;)
> Hi Konstantin.
>> Hi Alex,
>> Sorry for delay in reply.
>>> >> There might be situations
Hi Konstantin.
> Hi Alex,
> Sorry for delay in reply.
>> >> There might be situations (kind of attack when a lot of
>> >> fragmented packets are sent to a dpdk application in order
>> >> to flood the fragmentation table) when no additional mbufs
>> >> must be added to the fragmentations table sin
Hi Alex,
Sorry for delay in reply.
>
> >> There might be situations (kind of attack when a lot of
> >> fragmented packets are sent to a dpdk application in order
> >> to flood the fragmentation table) when no additional mbufs
> >> must be added to the fragmentations table since it already
> >> co
Hi Konstantin
> Hi Alex,
>> There might be situations (kind of attack when a lot of
>> fragmented packets are sent to a dpdk application in order
>> to flood the fragmentation table) when no additional mbufs
>> must be added to the fragmentations table since it already
>> contains to many of the
Hi Alex,
> There might be situations (kind of attack when a lot of
> fragmented packets are sent to a dpdk application in order
> to flood the fragmentation table) when no additional mbufs
> must be added to the fragmentations table since it already
> contains to many of them. Currently there is
6 matches
Mail list logo
