Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] vhost: added user callbacks for socket open/close

2017-08-29 Thread Jens Freimann
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 06:08:45AM +, Stojaczyk, DariuszX wrote: Hi Jens, I'm still not sure I understand the use case. So just for my understanding: users need to distinct between "the device is going away temporarily, keep the connection" and "we're shutting down for good", is that it?

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] vhost: added user callbacks for socket open/close

2017-08-28 Thread Stojaczyk, DariuszX
Hi Jens, > I'm still not sure I understand the use case. So just for my > understanding: users need to distinct between "the device is going away > temporarily, keep the connection" and "we're shutting down for good", is > that it? Yes, exactly. > Maybe it's just me or maybe it means you could e

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] vhost: added user callbacks for socket open/close

2017-08-25 Thread Jens Freimann
Hi Dariusz, On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 06:24:52PM +0200, Dariusz Stojaczyk wrote: When user receives destroy_device signal, he does not know *why* that event happened. He does not differ between socket shutdown and virtio processing pause. User could completely delete device during transition from