Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/4] flow classification library

2017-10-24 Thread Thomas Monjalon
24/10/2017 11:53, Iremonger, Bernard: > Hi Thomas, > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net] > > 24/10/2017 11:23, Mcnamara, John: > > > From: Iremonger, Bernard > > > > > > > > Hi Thomas, > > > > > > > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net] > > > > > > > > > I suppose y

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/4] flow classification library

2017-10-24 Thread Iremonger, Bernard
rien.mazarg...@6wind.com; Singh, > Jasvinder > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/4] flow classification library > > 24/10/2017 11:23, Mcnamara, John: > > From: Iremonger, Bernard > > > > > > Hi Thomas, > > > > > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:th

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/4] flow classification library

2017-10-24 Thread Thomas Monjalon
24/10/2017 11:23, Mcnamara, John: > From: Iremonger, Bernard > > > > Hi Thomas, > > > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net] > > > > > I suppose you are OK to wait one more release and call for more > > reviewers? > > > > This library was not ready for 17.11.RC1 having received som

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/4] flow classification library

2017-10-24 Thread Mcnamara, John
n > ; Iremonger, Bernard > > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/4] flow classification library > > Hi Thomas, > > > -Original Message- > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net] > > Sent: Monday, October 23, 2017 9:59 PM > > To:

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/4] flow classification library

2017-10-24 Thread Iremonger, Bernard
m; Singh, > Jasvinder ; Mcnamara, John > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/4] flow classification library > > 23/10/2017 17:16, Bernard Iremonger: > > The initial implementation is to provide counting of IPv4 five tuple > > packets for UDP, TCP and SCTP, but the l

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/4] flow classification library

2017-10-23 Thread Thomas Monjalon
23/10/2017 17:16, Bernard Iremonger: > The initial implementation is to provide counting of IPv4 five tuple packets > for UDP, TCP and SCTP, > but the library is planned to be as generic as possible. > > The flow information provided by this library is missing to implement full > IPFIX features,