> -----Original Message----- > From: Iremonger, Bernard > Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2017 9:41 AM > To: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>; Ananyev, > Konstantin <konstantin.anan...@intel.com>; Dumitrescu, Cristian > <cristian.dumitre...@intel.com>; adrien.mazarg...@6wind.com; Singh, > Jasvinder <jasvinder.si...@intel.com>; Mcnamara, John > <john.mcnam...@intel.com>; Iremonger, Bernard > <bernard.iremon...@intel.com> > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/4] flow classification library > > Hi Thomas, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net] > > Sent: Monday, October 23, 2017 9:59 PM > > To: Iremonger, Bernard <bernard.iremon...@intel.com> > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>; Ananyev, > > Konstantin <konstantin.anan...@intel.com>; Dumitrescu, Cristian > > <cristian.dumitre...@intel.com>; adrien.mazarg...@6wind.com; Singh, > > Jasvinder <jasvinder.si...@intel.com>; Mcnamara, John > > <john.mcnam...@intel.com> > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/4] flow classification library > > > I suppose you are OK to wait one more release and call for more > reviewers? > > This library was not ready for 17.11.RC1 having received some comments > just before the RC1 deadline. > It was then targeted for RC2 and we have pulled out all the stops to get > it ready for RC2. > > It is now at v10 of the patch set, there have been no review comments from > the community (apart from Intel), since RFC v3. > > I think that there has been ample time for the community to review this > patch set, calling for more reviewers at this point is not helpful. > > The API's of the library are marked as experimental, so there will be no > issues with ABI breakage, if there are requests for changes later. > > I am not OK to wait one more release, I believe we have followed the > process correctly.
+1 for inclusion in RC2. John
