Hi Santosh,
On Tue, 17 Jan 2017 19:01:23 +0530, Santosh Shukla
wrote:
> Hi Hemant,
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:12:56AM +0530, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
> > When possible, replace the uses of rte_mempool_create() with
> > the helper provided in librte_mbuf: rte_pktmbuf_pool_create().
> >
> > This
Please ignore.
Apologies for repeated sent. This patch was posted earlier.
- Hemant
> -Original Message-
> From: Hemant Agrawal [mailto:hemant.agra...@nxp.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 6:53 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: thomas.monja...@6wind.com; bruce.richard...@intel.com; Shre
On 1/17/2017 7:01 PM, Santosh Shukla wrote:
Hi Hemant,
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:12:56AM +0530, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
When possible, replace the uses of rte_mempool_create() with
the helper provided in librte_mbuf: rte_pktmbuf_pool_create().
This is the preferred way to create a mbuf pool.
T
Hi Hemant,
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:12:56AM +0530, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
> When possible, replace the uses of rte_mempool_create() with
> the helper provided in librte_mbuf: rte_pktmbuf_pool_create().
>
> This is the preferred way to create a mbuf pool.
>
> This also updates the documentation.
4 matches
Mail list logo