Hi Santosh, On Tue, 17 Jan 2017 19:01:23 +0530, Santosh Shukla <santosh.shu...@caviumnetworks.com> wrote: > Hi Hemant, > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:12:56AM +0530, Hemant Agrawal wrote: > > When possible, replace the uses of rte_mempool_create() with > > the helper provided in librte_mbuf: rte_pktmbuf_pool_create(). > > > > This is the preferred way to create a mbuf pool. > > > > This also updates the documentation. > > > > Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.m...@6wind.com> > > Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com> > > --- > > This patch is derived from the RFC from Olivier: > > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/15925/ > > rte_mempool_create to _empty/populate OR rte_pktmbuf_pool_create > changes missing for mempool testcases. do you have plan to take them > up Or shall I post the patches?
Not sure we should add something in test_mempool.c, since we are converting to a mbuf api. As far as I can see, rte_pktmbuf_pool_create() is already tested in test_mbuf.c. Regards, Olivier
