Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] net/mlx5: fix reported Rx/Tx desc limits

2024-10-30 Thread Raslan Darawsheh
Hi, From: Igor Gutorov Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2024 11:44 PM To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: Igor Gutorov Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] net/mlx5: fix reported Rx/Tx desc limits Hi, Slava > > Is an `int` appropriate for `log_max_wq_sz`? Seems like a `uint8_t` > > is sufficient, but I've left it an `int` for c

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] net/mlx5: fix reported Rx/Tx desc limits

2024-09-19 Thread Igor Gutorov
Hi, On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 11:58 PM Igor Gutorov wrote: > > Hi, > > Sorry, I used the wrong --to and --cc switches. > Adding Slava just in case. > > Sincerely, > Igor. > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 11:44 PM Igor Gutorov wrote: > > > > Hi, Slava > > > > > > Is an `int` appropriate for `log_max_wq_sz

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] net/mlx5: fix reported Rx/Tx desc limits

2024-08-07 Thread Igor Gutorov
Hi, Sorry, I used the wrong --to and --cc switches. Adding Slava just in case. Sincerely, Igor. On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 11:44 PM Igor Gutorov wrote: > > Hi, Slava > > > > Is an `int` appropriate for `log_max_wq_sz`? Seems like a `uint8_t` > > > is sufficient, but I've left it an `int` for consis