Re: [PATCH] net/tap: do not include l2 header in gso size when compared with mtu

2023-10-17 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Tue, 8 Mar 2022 22:35:18 +0800 Harold Huang wrote: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 4:27 PM Harold Huang wrote: > > > > The gso size is calculated with all of the headers and payload. As a > > result, the l2 header should not be included when comparing gso size > > with mtu. > > > > Fixes: 050316a88

RE: [PATCH] net/tap: do not include l2 header in gso size when compared with mtu

2022-05-24 Thread Ophir Munk
Ophir Munk ; Raslan Darawsheh > > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org; Keith Wiles > Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/tap: do not include l2 header in gso size when > compared with mtu > > On 3/8/2022 2:35 PM, Harold Huang wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 4:27 PM Harold Huang > wrote: >

Re: [PATCH] net/tap: do not include l2 header in gso size when compared with mtu

2022-03-08 Thread Harold Huang
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 4:27 PM Harold Huang wrote: > > The gso size is calculated with all of the headers and payload. As a > result, the l2 header should not be included when comparing gso size > with mtu. > > Fixes: 050316a88313 ("net/tap: support TSO (TCP Segment Offload)") > Cc: sta...@dpdk.o

Re: [PATCH] net/tap: do not include l2 header in gso size when compared with mtu

2022-03-04 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 2/28/2022 8:27 AM, Harold Huang wrote: The gso size is calculated with all of the headers and payload. As a result, the l2 header should not be included when comparing gso size with mtu. Fixes: 050316a88313 ("net/tap: support TSO (TCP Segment Offload)") Cc: sta...@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Haro