On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 4:27 PM Harold Huang <baymaxhu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The gso size is calculated with all of the headers and payload. As a
> result, the l2 header should not be included when comparing gso size
> with mtu.
>
> Fixes: 050316a88313 ("net/tap: support TSO (TCP Segment Offload)")
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> Signed-off-by: Harold Huang <baymaxhu...@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> index f1b48cae82..2b561d232c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> @@ -731,7 +731,7 @@ pmd_tx_burst(void *queue, struct rte_mbuf **bufs,
> uint16_t nb_pkts)
> mbuf_in->l4_len;
> tso_segsz = mbuf_in->tso_segsz + hdrs_len;
> if (unlikely(tso_segsz == hdrs_len) ||
> - tso_segsz > *txq->mtu) {
> + tso_segsz > *txq->mtu + mbuf_in->l2_len) {
> txq->stats.errs++;
> break;
> }
> --
> 2.27.0
>
Hi, Jiayu,
This is the only example in the driver to use GSO. I think it is
important for us to calculate a correct GSO size. I see you are the
GSO lib maintainer, could you please help review this patch?
