[dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0" can receive network packet by i40e NIC

2015-07-31 Thread Zhang, Helin
> -Original Message- > From: Jeff Venable, Sr. [mailto:jeff at vectranetworks.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 6:59 PM > To: Zhang, Helin > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; lhffjzh; 'Thomas Monjalon' > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0" ca

[dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0" can receive network packet by i40e NIC

2015-07-30 Thread Jeff Venable, Sr.
-Original Message- From: Zhang, Helin [mailto:helin.zh...@intel.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 5:56 PM To: Jeff Venable, Sr. ; lhffjzh ; 'Thomas Monjalon' Cc: dev at dpdk.org Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0" can receive network packet by i40e NIC

[dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0" can receive network packet by i40e NIC

2015-07-23 Thread Zhang, Helin
> -Original Message- > From: Jeff Venable, Sr. [mailto:jeff at vectranetworks.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 5:47 PM > To: Zhang, Helin; lhffjzh; 'Thomas Monjalon' > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0" ca

[dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0" can receive network packet by i40e NIC

2015-07-23 Thread Jeff Venable, Sr.
t dpdk.org; maintainers at dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0" can receive network packet by i40e NIC Good to know that! > -Original Message- > From: lhffjzh [mailto:lhffjzh at 126.com] > Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 12:34 PM > To: Zhang, Helin

[dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0" can receive network packet by i40e NIC

2015-02-28 Thread Zhang, Helin
gt; From: Zhang, Helin [mailto:helin.zhang at intel.com] > Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 11:18 AM > To: lhffjzh; 'Thomas Monjalon' > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; maintainers at dpdk.org > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0" can receive network packet by > i40e N

[dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0" can receive network packet by i40e NIC

2015-02-28 Thread lhffjzh
E_FDIR_MODE_SIGNATURE, }; Regards, Haifeng -Original Message- From: Zhang, Helin [mailto:helin.zh...@intel.com] Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 11:18 AM To: lhffjzh; 'Thomas Monjalon' Cc: dev at dpdk.org; maintainers at dpdk.org Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0&q

[dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0" can receive network packet by i40e NIC

2015-02-28 Thread lhffjzh
Hi Thomas, Thanks very much for your reminder, you give me many help in this mail list. The issue with detailed information just as below. but I don't know who is the dpdk i40e maintainers? is maintainers at dpdk.org? Hardware list: 2 i40e 40G NICs Xeon E5-2670 v2(10 cores) 32G memo

[dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0" can receive network packet by i40e NIC

2015-02-28 Thread Zhang, Helin
Hi Haifeng > -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of lhffjzh > Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 9:48 AM > To: 'Thomas Monjalon' > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; maintainers at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue &q

[dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0" can receive network packet by i40e NIC

2015-02-27 Thread lhffjzh
omas Monjalon' Cc: dev at dpdk.org; 'Prasad Rao (prrao)' Subject: [dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0" can receive network packet by i40e NIC Hi All, We use 4 cores loop 4 rx queues on one i40e port, but only rx queue "0" can receive network packet, do anyone kindly

[dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0" can receive network packet by i40e NIC

2015-02-27 Thread lhffjzh
Hi All, We use 4 cores loop 4 rx queues on one i40e port, but only rx queue "0" can receive network packet, do anyone kindly know why? BTW, all of network packet has same destination ip address but has more than 200 different source ip address. In addition, by our test, all of rx queues can recei

[dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0" can receive network packet by i40e NIC

2015-02-27 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2015-02-27 16:47, lhffjzh: > Hi All, > > We use 4 cores loop 4 rx queues on one i40e port, but only rx queue "0" can > receive network packet, do anyone kindly know why? BTW, all of network > packet has same destination ip address but has more than 200 different > source ip address. It's possible