> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Neil Horman
> Sent: Monday, June 6, 2016 2:48 PM
> To: Thomas Monjalon
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Mcnamara, John ; Christian
> Ehrhardt ; Markos Chandras
> ; Panu Matilainen
> Subject:
> -Original Message-
> From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com]
> Sent: Sunday, June 5, 2016 7:15 PM
> To: Mcnamara, John
> Cc: dev ; Christian Ehrhardt
> ; Markos Chandras ;
> Panu Matilainen
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] RFC: DPDK Long Term Support
>
On 7 June 2016 at 08:36, Christian Ehrhardt <
christian.ehrhardt at canonical.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Mcnamara, John
> wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > LTS Version
> >
> >
> > The proposed initial LTS version will be DPDK 16.07. The next versions,
> > based
> > on a 2 yea
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Mcnamara, John
wrote:
[...]
>
> LTS Version
>
>
> The proposed initial LTS version will be DPDK 16.07. The next versions,
> based
> on a 2 year cycle, will be DPDK 18.08, 20.08, etc.
>
I can see on the discussions that much more things around this have
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 3, 2016 5:05 PM
> To: Mcnamara, John
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Christian Ehrhardt ;
> Markos Chandras ; Panu Matilainen redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] RFC
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Hall [mailto:mhall at mhcomputing.net]
> Sent: Friday, June 3, 2016 7:17 PM
> To: Mcnamara, John
> Cc: dev ; Christian Ehrhardt
> ; Markos Chandras ;
> Panu Matilainen
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] RFC: DPDK Long Term Support
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 03:44:47PM +0200, Nirmoy Das wrote:
>
> > LTS Version
> >
> >
> > The proposed initial LTS version will be DPDK 16.07. The next versions,
> > based
> > on a 2 year cycle, will be DPDK 18.08, 20.08, etc.
>
> Hi,
>
> I can see 16.07's release due date is 18th
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 03:31:09PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-06-06 19:49, Yuanhan Liu:
> > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 06:05:15PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 2016-06-03 15:07, Mcnamara, John:
> > > > Developers submitting fixes to the mainline should also CC the
> > > > maintainer s
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 06:05:15PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2016-06-03 15:07, Mcnamara, John:
> > Introduction
> >
> >
> > This document sets out a proposal for a DPDK Long Term Support release
> > (LTS).
>
> In general, LTS refer to a longer maintenance than than re
2016-06-06 22:14, Yuanhan Liu:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 03:31:09PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2016-06-06 19:49, Yuanhan Liu:
> > > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 06:05:15PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > 2016-06-03 15:07, Mcnamara, John:
> > > > > Developers submitting fixes to the mainline
2016-06-06 09:47, Neil Horman:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 11:27:29AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2016-06-05 14:15, Neil Horman:
> > > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 03:07:49PM +, Mcnamara, John wrote:
> > > > Introduction
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > This document sets out a proposal for
> LTS Version
>
>
> The proposed initial LTS version will be DPDK 16.07. The next versions, based
> on a 2 year cycle, will be DPDK 18.08, 20.08, etc.
Hi,
I can see 16.07's release due date is 18th July. Is it possible to know
the timeline for RC versions of dpdk-16.07 ? This might
2016-06-06 19:49, Yuanhan Liu:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 06:05:15PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2016-06-03 15:07, Mcnamara, John:
> > > Developers submitting fixes to the mainline should also CC the maintainer
> > > so
> > > that they can evaluate the patch. A email address
> > > could be
2016-06-05 14:15, Neil Horman:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 03:07:49PM +, Mcnamara, John wrote:
> > Introduction
> >
> >
> > This document sets out a proposal for a DPDK Long Term Support release
> > (LTS).
> >
> > The purpose of the DPDK LTS will be to maintain a stable release of
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 04:21:11PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-06-06 09:47, Neil Horman:
> > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 11:27:29AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 2016-06-05 14:15, Neil Horman:
> > > > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 03:07:49PM +, Mcnamara, John wrote:
> > > > > Introduction
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 11:27:29AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-06-05 14:15, Neil Horman:
> > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 03:07:49PM +, Mcnamara, John wrote:
> > > Introduction
> > >
> > >
> > > This document sets out a proposal for a DPDK Long Term Support release
> > > (LTS
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 03:07:49PM +, Mcnamara, John wrote:
> Introduction
>
>
> This document sets out a proposal for a DPDK Long Term Support release (LTS).
>
> The purpose of the DPDK LTS will be to maintain a stable release of DPDK with
> backported bug fixes over an extended
Hi,
2016-06-03 15:07, Mcnamara, John:
> Introduction
>
>
> This document sets out a proposal for a DPDK Long Term Support release (LTS).
In general, LTS refer to a longer maintenance than than regular one.
Here we are talking to doing some maintenance as stable releases first.
Curre
Introduction
This document sets out a proposal for a DPDK Long Term Support release (LTS).
The purpose of the DPDK LTS will be to maintain a stable release of DPDK with
backported bug fixes over an extended period of time. This will provide
downstream consumers of DPDK with a stable
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 03:07:49PM +, Mcnamara, John wrote:
> What changes should be backported
> -
>
> * Bug fixes that don't break the ABI.
>
>
> What changes should not be backported
> -
>
> * API or ABI breaking changes
20 matches
Mail list logo
