Hi,
Thanks Dave for the report.
I suggest to continue on the new mailing list:
moving at dpdk.org
Please register if you are interested in the structure move:
http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/moving
2016-10-21 15:00, Dave Neary:
> Hi all,
>
> We had a great session yesterday on this
Thanks Dave for your work and notes: Comment inline
> On Oct 21, 2016, at 3:00 PM, Dave Neary wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> We had a great session yesterday on this topic, I took some notes - does
> anyone who was there have any corrections, or anyone who was not have
> any comments?
>
> Thanks,
> Da
Hi all,
We had a great session yesterday on this topic, I took some notes - does
anyone who was there have any corrections, or anyone who was not have
any comments?
Thanks,
Dave.
Tim led the discussion, and started by outlining that he saw there were
3 different questions which we should treat i
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 08:04:19AM +, O'Driscoll, Tim wrote:
> > From: Jerin Jacob [mailto:jerin.jacob at caviumnetworks.com]
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 03:27:27PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 2016-10-18 17:04, Jerin Jacob:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:23:42PM -0400, Dave Nea
2016-10-19 09:40, Dave Neary:
> On 10/19/2016 09:04 AM, O'Driscoll, Tim wrote:
> > From: Jerin Jacob [mailto:jerin.jacob at caviumnetworks.com]
> > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 03:27:27PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > How can we solve issues if you don't give more details than
> > > > "hear co
Hi,
On 10/19/2016 09:04 AM, O'Driscoll, Tim wrote:
>> From: Jerin Jacob [mailto:jerin.jacob at caviumnetworks.com]
>> Having said that, Does anyone see any issue in moving to LF?
>> If yes, Then we should enumerate the issues and discuss further.
>
> This is a great point. Can you explain what yo
> From: Jerin Jacob [mailto:jerin.jacob at caviumnetworks.com]
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 03:27:27PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2016-10-18 17:04, Jerin Jacob:
> > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:23:42PM -0400, Dave Neary wrote:
> > > > > I still hear concerns on this, and based on discussions
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 03:27:27PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-10-18 17:04, Jerin Jacob:
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:23:42PM -0400, Dave Neary wrote:
> > > > I still hear concerns on this, and based on discussions with others who
> > > > put their names to the post below, they do too.
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:23:42PM -0400, Dave Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/17/2016 07:52 AM, O'Driscoll, Tim wrote:
> >> -Original Message-
> >> I don't really understand what can be gained by moving to Linux
> >> Foundation, but I am almost sure that no individual expert will be able
> >
2016-10-18 17:04, Jerin Jacob:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:23:42PM -0400, Dave Neary wrote:
> > > I still hear concerns on this, and based on discussions with others who
> > > put their names to the post below, they do too. I think it's a perception
> > > that we need to address.
> >
> > I woul
Hi,
On 10/17/2016 07:52 AM, O'Driscoll, Tim wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> I don't really understand what can be gained by moving to Linux
>> Foundation, but I am almost sure that no individual expert will be able
>> to take any leaderhip role as those roles will be fulfilled by Platinum,
Hi HK,
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Hobywan Kenoby
> Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 11:24 AM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim ; dev at dpdk.org;
> users at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Project Governance and Linux
3 AM
To: dev at dpdk.org; users at dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] Project Governance and Linux Foundation
This email is being sent on behalf of: Cavium, Cisco, Intel, NXP & Red Hat.
Since its creation as an open source project in 2013, DPDK has grown
significantly. The number of DPDK users, contr
4:33 PM
To: dev at dpdk.org; users at dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] Project Governance and Linux Foundation
This email is being sent on behalf of: Cavium, Cisco, Intel, NXP & Red
Hat.
Since its creation as an open source project in 2013, DPDK has grown
significantly. The number of DPDK users
Hi,
This is a really interesting use case.
Questions below,
2016-10-12 13:44, qin.chunhua at zte.com.cn:
> ZTE is supportive of improving the DPDK project governance including
> moving the project to the Linux Foundation.
> DPDK has been used in lots of ZTE's equipments and solutions such as
This email is being sent on behalf of: Cavium, Cisco, Intel, NXP & Red Hat.
Since its creation as an open source project in 2013, DPDK has grown
significantly. The number of DPDK users, contributors, commercial products that
use DPDK and open source projects that depend on it have all increased
16 matches
Mail list logo
