2016-10-18 17:04, Jerin Jacob: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:23:42PM -0400, Dave Neary wrote: > > > I still hear concerns on this, and based on discussions with others who > > > put their names to the post below, they do too. I think it's a perception > > > that we need to address. > > > > I would say that there is still a perception issue, for companies who > > look at the active developers, the owners of the project's resources > > (infra, domain name), and who have heard anecdotal evidence of issues in > > the past. I think the project has made a lot of progress since I have > > been following it, and I do not believe there are any major issues with > > the independence of the project. However, there are still concerned > > parties on this front, and the concerns can be easily addressed by a > > move to the LF. > > +1
How can we solve issues if you don't give more details than "hear concerns" or "heard anecdotal evidence of issues"?
