Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd

2020-12-11 Thread Michael Lilja
To: Michael Lilja > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Finn Christensen ; Bent Kuhre > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd > > Hi Michael, > > 20/04/2020 07:05, Michael Lilja: > > Actually the open-source driver development has been on hold until > just recently, due to other prio

Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd

2020-12-11 Thread Thomas Monjalon
Hi Michael, 20/04/2020 07:05, Michael Lilja: > Actually the open-source driver development has been on hold until just > recently, due to other priorities. We just recently allocated a new team to > do the open source driver, a team of people who has not been working with > DPDK before, so the

Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd

2020-04-19 Thread Michael Lilja
> -Original Message- > From: Neil Horman > Sent: 19. april 2020 23:16 > To: Michael Lilja > Cc: Thomas Monjalon ; Finn Christensen > ; dev@dpdk.org; Bent Kuhre ; > techbo...@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 04:38:4

Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd

2020-04-19 Thread Neil Horman
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 04:38:42AM +, Michael Lilja wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Neil Horman > > Sent: 17. april 2020 04:55 > > To: Thomas Monjalon > > Cc: Finn Christensen ; dev@dpdk.org; Bent Kuhre > > ; Michael Lilja ; techbo...

Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd

2020-04-16 Thread Michael Lilja
> -Original Message- > From: Neil Horman > Sent: 17. april 2020 04:55 > To: Thomas Monjalon > Cc: Finn Christensen ; dev@dpdk.org; Bent Kuhre > ; Michael Lilja ; techbo...@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:07:12PM +

Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd

2020-04-16 Thread Neil Horman
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:07:12PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 31/03/2020 21:56, Neil Horman: > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 02:29:08PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > 31/03/2020 14:17, Neil Horman: > > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 01:25:25PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > >

Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd

2020-04-01 Thread Neil Horman
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:07:12PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 31/03/2020 21:56, Neil Horman: > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 02:29:08PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > 31/03/2020 14:17, Neil Horman: > > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 01:25:25PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > >

Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd

2020-04-01 Thread Neil Horman
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 09:59:27PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 31/03/2020 21:51, Neil Horman: > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 07:58:45AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 12:39:17 + > > > Michael Lilja wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I appreciate the discussi

Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd

2020-03-31 Thread Thomas Monjalon
31/03/2020 21:56, Neil Horman: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 02:29:08PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 31/03/2020 14:17, Neil Horman: > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 01:25:25PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Raising this topic again. > > > > > > > > As said in the past, it

Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd

2020-03-31 Thread Thomas Monjalon
31/03/2020 21:51, Neil Horman: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 07:58:45AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 12:39:17 + > > Michael Lilja wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I appreciate the discussion. It would of course be nice if vendors could > > > be allowed to use external

Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd

2020-03-31 Thread Neil Horman
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 02:29:08PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 31/03/2020 14:17, Neil Horman: > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 01:25:25PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Raising this topic again. > > > > > > As said in the past, it is better to have this PMD inside DPDK. > > >

Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd

2020-03-31 Thread Neil Horman
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 07:58:45AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 12:39:17 + > Michael Lilja wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I appreciate the discussion. It would of course be nice if vendors could be > > allowed to use external libraries/drivers and have a DPDK shim but I a

Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd

2020-03-31 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 12:39:17 + Michael Lilja wrote: > Hi, > > I appreciate the discussion. It would of course be nice if vendors could be > allowed to use external libraries/drivers and have a DPDK shim but I also > understand the concern. > > We have started the movement towards an open

Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd

2020-03-31 Thread Michael Lilja
> -Original Message- > From: Thomas Monjalon > Sent: 31. marts 2020 14:45 > To: Michael Lilja > Cc: Neil Horman ; Finn Christensen > ; dev@dpdk.org; Bent Kuhre > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd > > 31/03/2020 14:39, Michael Lilja: > > Hi, > &

Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd

2020-03-31 Thread Thomas Monjalon
31/03/2020 14:39, Michael Lilja: > Hi, > > I appreciate the discussion. It would of course be nice if vendors could be > allowed to use external libraries/drivers and have a DPDK shim but I also > understand the concern. > > We have started the movement towards an open source variant of our NIC

Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd

2020-03-31 Thread Michael Lilja
; dev@dpdk.org; Bent Kuhre > ; Michael Lilja ; techbo...@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd > > 31/03/2020 14:17, Neil Horman: > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 01:25:25PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Raising this topic again

Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd

2020-03-31 Thread Thomas Monjalon
31/03/2020 14:17, Neil Horman: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 01:25:25PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Raising this topic again. > > > > As said in the past, it is better to have this PMD inside DPDK. > > We discussed some concerns, but I think the consensus was to integrate > > Napate

Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd

2020-03-31 Thread Neil Horman
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 01:25:25PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Hi, > > Raising this topic again. > > As said in the past, it is better to have this PMD inside DPDK. > We discussed some concerns, but I think the consensus was to integrate > Napatech PMD anyway. > > I am sad that you did not f

Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd

2020-03-31 Thread Thomas Monjalon
Hi, Raising this topic again. As said in the past, it is better to have this PMD inside DPDK. We discussed some concerns, but I think the consensus was to integrate Napatech PMD anyway. I am sad that you did not feel welcome enough to follow up with patches during all these years. Please would y

Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd

2018-01-09 Thread Thomas Monjalon
10/01/2018 01:19, Neil Horman: > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 09:36:03PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 09/01/2018 21:20, Neil Horman: > > > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 07:57:50PM +, Michael Lilja wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 04:15:47PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > >

Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd

2018-01-09 Thread Neil Horman
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 09:36:03PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 09/01/2018 21:20, Neil Horman: > > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 07:57:50PM +, Michael Lilja wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 04:15:47PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > 08/01/2018 14:08, Finn Chri

Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd

2018-01-09 Thread Thomas Monjalon
09/01/2018 21:20, Neil Horman: > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 07:57:50PM +, Michael Lilja wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 04:15:47PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > 08/01/2018 14:08, Finn Christensen: > > > > > Hi Thomas, > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for bringing this di

Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd

2018-01-09 Thread Neil Horman
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 07:57:50PM +, Michael Lilja wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 04:15:47PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > 08/01/2018 14:08, Finn Christensen: > > > > Hi Thomas, > > > > > > > > Thanks for bringing this discussion up again. > > > > > > > > The Napatech

Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd

2018-01-09 Thread Michael Lilja
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 04:15:47PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > Hi, > > > > 08/01/2018 14:08, Finn Christensen: > > > Hi Thomas, > > > > > > Thanks for bringing this discussion up again. > > > > > > The Napatech PMD is build on top of our proprietary driver. The > reason is basically that we

Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd

2018-01-09 Thread Neil Horman
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 04:15:47PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Hi, > > 08/01/2018 14:08, Finn Christensen: > > Hi Thomas, > > > > Thanks for bringing this discussion up again. > > > > The Napatech PMD is build on top of our proprietary driver. The reason is > > basically that we utilize man

Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd

2018-01-09 Thread Finn Christensen
>-Original Message- >From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net] >Sent: 8. januar 2018 16:16 >To: Finn Christensen >Cc: dev@dpdk.org >Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd > >Hi, > >08/01/2018 14:08, Finn Christensen: >> Hi Thomas, >> >&

Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd

2018-01-08 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Mon, 08 Jan 2018 16:15:47 +0100 Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Hi, > > 08/01/2018 14:08, Finn Christensen: > > Hi Thomas, > > > > Thanks for bringing this discussion up again. > > > > The Napatech PMD is build on top of our proprietary driver. The reason is > > basically that we utilize many yea

Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd

2018-01-08 Thread Thomas Monjalon
Hi, 08/01/2018 14:08, Finn Christensen: > Hi Thomas, > > Thanks for bringing this discussion up again. > > The Napatech PMD is build on top of our proprietary driver. The reason is > basically that we utilize many years of driver development and thus reuses > the FPGA controlling code in the D

[dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd

2018-01-08 Thread Finn Christensen
Hi Thomas, Thanks for bringing this discussion up again. The Napatech PMD is build on top of our proprietary driver. The reason is basically that we utilize many years of driver development and thus reuses the FPGA controlling code in the DPDK PMD. The Napatech driver suite is still closed sou