Re: [dpdk-dev] Compiling DPDK 17.02 with a Busybox-based tar

2017-03-14 14:20, Raphael Cohn: > Why it is surprising that I need to compile DPDK on a system Busybox? > > I currently build DPDK both for my local Alpine Linux system (busybox) > using the system compiler, use busybox for my cross-tools toolchain, and > also use it in Libertine Linux. It means a

Re: [dpdk-dev] Compiling DPDK 17.02 with a Busybox-based tar

Why it is surprising that I need to compile DPDK on a system Busybox? I currently build DPDK both for my local Alpine Linux system (busybox) using the system compiler, use busybox for my cross-tools toolchain, and also use it in Libertine Linux. It means a system using DPDK can be much more minima

Re: [dpdk-dev] Compiling DPDK 17.02 with a Busybox-based tar

2017-03-14 07:58, Raphael Cohn: > Hi, > > To compile DPDK on a system with Busybox tar installed, it's necessary to > make a small change to the build system:- > > sed -i -e '/--keep-newer-files/d' mk/rte.sdkinstall.mk > sed -i -e 's;--strip-components=1 \\;--strip-components=1;g' mk/ > r

[dpdk-dev] Compiling DPDK 17.02 with a Busybox-based tar

Hi, To compile DPDK on a system with Busybox tar installed, it's necessary to make a small change to the build system:- sed -i -e '/--keep-newer-files/d' mk/rte.sdkinstall.mk sed -i -e 's;--strip-components=1 \\;--strip-components=1;g' mk/ rte.sdkinstall.mk I'm not sure whether the impac