On 11/29/15 11:10, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 11:07:44AM +0200, Vlad Zolotarov wrote:
>>
>> On 11/26/15 22:35, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> When introducing LRO, Vlad has defined the macro RTE_ETHDEV_HAS_LRO_SUPPORT:
>>> http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/commit/lib/librte_ether/rte_eth
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 11:07:44AM +0200, Vlad Zolotarov wrote:
>
>
> On 11/26/15 22:35, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >When introducing LRO, Vlad has defined the macro RTE_ETHDEV_HAS_LRO_SUPPORT:
> >http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/commit/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h?id=8eecb329
> >
> >It allows to use t
On 11/26/15 22:35, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> When introducing LRO, Vlad has defined the macro RTE_ETHDEV_HAS_LRO_SUPPORT:
> http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/commit/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h?id=8eecb329
>
> It allows to use the feature without version check (before the release or
> after a backport)
When introducing LRO, Vlad has defined the macro RTE_ETHDEV_HAS_LRO_SUPPORT:
http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/commit/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h?id=8eecb329
It allows to use the feature without version check (before the release or
after a backport).
Do you think it is useful?
Should we define other m
4 matches
Mail list logo