> -Original Message-
> From: Markovic, Stevan [mailto:smarkovi at akamai.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 3:22 PM
> To: Ananyev, Konstantin; yuzhichang_scl at hotmail.com; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] ACL lookup doesn't work for some schemes
>
&
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 4:56 AM, Ananyev, Konstantin <
konstantin.ananyev at intel.com> wrote:
> Yes, right now, libtre_acl to work correctly first field has to be 1B long
> and all subsequent grouped into sets of 4 consecutive bytes.
> I thought we have it documented into our PG, ACL section
Hi
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of ???
> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 9:19 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] ACL lookup doesn't work for some schemes
>
> Hi,I noticed that ACL lookup doesn
I tested against DPDK 1.7.0, 1.8.0 and trunk(?ed2547b6).?
> From: yuzhichang_scl at hotmail.com
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: ACL lookup doesn't work for some schemes
> Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 17:23:53 +0800
>
> Sorry I forgot to attach the sample code i
Sorry I forgot to attach the sample code in previous mail. See the attached.
From: yuzhichang_...@hotmail.com
To: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: ACL lookup doesn't work for some schemes
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 17:18:55 +0800
Hi,I noticed that ACL lookup doesn't work for some schemes.1. If the fir
Hi,I noticed that ACL lookup doesn't work for some schemes.1. If the first
field is not uint8_t, even all fields are wildcard, lookup doesn't find the
matching rule. See acl_8last.c.2. I prepended a uint8_t field, keep other
fields be wildcard, lookup returns the correct result. See acl_8las
6 matches
Mail list logo
