Hi Alex,
>
> Hi Konstantin.
>
> Could we please make a final decision about counting mbufs, since It still
> feels to me like an unfinished business?
> Below are my final argumens. if they are not sound to you, just nack ;)
Sorry, but as I said before - not sure that it really worth it.
Still
Hi Konstantin.
Could we please make a final decision about counting mbufs, since It still
feels to me like an unfinished business?
Below are my final argumens. if they are not sound to you, just nack ;)
> Hi Konstantin.
>> Hi Alex,
>> Sorry for delay in reply.
>>> >> There might be situations
Hi Konstantin.
> Hi Alex,
> Sorry for delay in reply.
>> >> There might be situations (kind of attack when a lot of
>> >> fragmented packets are sent to a dpdk application in order
>> >> to flood the fragmentation table) when no additional mbufs
>> >> must be added to the fragmentations table sin
Hi Alex,
Sorry for delay in reply.
>
> >> There might be situations (kind of attack when a lot of
> >> fragmented packets are sent to a dpdk application in order
> >> to flood the fragmentation table) when no additional mbufs
> >> must be added to the fragmentations table since it already
> >> co
Hi Konstantin
> Hi Alex,
>> There might be situations (kind of attack when a lot of
>> fragmented packets are sent to a dpdk application in order
>> to flood the fragmentation table) when no additional mbufs
>> must be added to the fragmentations table since it already
>> contains to many of the
Hi Alex,
> There might be situations (kind of attack when a lot of
> fragmented packets are sent to a dpdk application in order
> to flood the fragmentation table) when no additional mbufs
> must be added to the fragmentations table since it already
> contains to many of them. Currently there is
There might be situations (kind of attack when a lot of
fragmented packets are sent to a dpdk application in order
to flood the fragmentation table) when no additional mbufs
must be added to the fragmentations table since it already
contains to many of them. Currently there is no way to
determine t
7 matches
Mail list logo
