31/01/2018 13:18, Neil Horman:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 05:15:01PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 30/01/2018 16:54, Neil Horman:
> > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 10:46:27PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > 22/01/2018 02:48, Neil Horman:
> > > > > v5 Changes
> > > > > * Clean ups suggested by
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 05:15:01PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 30/01/2018 16:54, Neil Horman:
> > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 10:46:27PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 22/01/2018 02:48, Neil Horman:
> > > > v5 Changes
> > > > * Clean ups suggested by Thomas
> > >
> > > There were a lot of new
30/01/2018 16:54, Neil Horman:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 10:46:27PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 22/01/2018 02:48, Neil Horman:
> > > v5 Changes
> > > * Clean ups suggested by Thomas
> >
> > There were a lot of new functions to tag when rebasing this v5.
> > Rebased and applied, thanks.
> >
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 10:46:27PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 22/01/2018 02:48, Neil Horman:
> > v5 Changes
> > * Clean ups suggested by Thomas
>
> There were a lot of new functions to tag when rebasing this v5.
> Rebased and applied, thanks.
>
Sorry, not clear what you mean by this. Are y
22/01/2018 02:48, Neil Horman:
> v5 Changes
> * Clean ups suggested by Thomas
There were a lot of new functions to tag when rebasing this v5.
Rebased and applied, thanks.
Hey all-
A few days ago, I was lamenting the fact that, when reviewing patches I
would frequently complain about ABI changes that were actually considered safe
because they were part of the EXPERIMENTAL api set. John M. asked me then what
I might do to improve the situation, and the follow
6 matches
Mail list logo
