On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 05:15:01PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 30/01/2018 16:54, Neil Horman: > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 10:46:27PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > 22/01/2018 02:48, Neil Horman: > > > > v5 Changes > > > > * Clean ups suggested by Thomas > > > > > > There were a lot of new functions to tag when rebasing this v5. > > > Rebased and applied, thanks. > > > > > Sorry, not clear what you mean by this. Are you saying that there were > > several > > new experimental API's added recently that my initial set of tags missed? > > If > > so, thanks for doing that. I will also be sending another patch set soon, > > to > > reconcile API's that are documented as experimental but not listed in the > > version map as such > > I meant that I have applied a lot of new experimental functions > after you sent the v5. > So I had to add the tag and CFLAGS for these new functions. > Usual rebase work. > Understood, thank you.
> About reconciling experimental functions and map, > we should also consider upgrading some functions to non-experimental. > I figured if I were to just do a reconcilliation of everything that is currently documented as experimental, that would be the impetus for their authors to yell at me about their not actually being experimental anymore, and I could fix that up in subsequent versions :) Neil > >
