[dpdk-dev] [dpdk-users] Project Governance and Linux Foundation

2016-10-18 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2016-10-17 14:40, O'Driscoll, Tim: > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > > 2016-10-17 11:52, O'Driscoll, Tim: > > > From: Hobywan Kenoby > > > > The current DPDK version can run on virtually all processors (Intel, > > > > IBM and ARM) and leverage all NICs: is there **real

[dpdk-dev] [dpdk-users] Project Governance and Linux Foundation

2016-10-18 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2016-10-18 12:16, Liu Yuan: > China Mobile would like to support moving the DPDK project to the Linux > Foundation. OK, there can be some advantages to join the Linux Foundation. > DPDK is a key technology / element in the NFV. As an end user, we can foresee > the importance of DPDK in the futu

[dpdk-dev] [dpdk-users] Project Governance and Linux Foundation

2016-10-17 Thread O'Driscoll, Tim
> -Original Message- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 1:41 PM > To: users at dpdk.org; dev at dpdk.org > Cc: O'Driscoll, Tim ; Hobywan Kenoby > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Project Governance and Linux Foundation > > 2016-10-1

[dpdk-dev] [dpdk-users] Project Governance and Linux Foundation

2016-10-17 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2016-10-17 11:52, O'Driscoll, Tim: > From: Hobywan Kenoby > > The current DPDK version can run on virtually all processors (Intel, IBM > > and ARM) and leverage all NICs: is there **really** anyone questionning > > openness of the community? > > I still hear concerns on this, and based on discussi

[dpdk-dev] [dpdk-users] Project Governance and Linux Foundation

2016-10-13 Thread Muhammad Zain-ul-Abideen
I agree with Mr. Thomas Monjalon. Any optimization in DPDK structure should be made open.