Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/2] standardize rawdev names

2019-07-30 Thread Thomas Monjalon
30/07/2019 14:20, Neil Horman: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:17:46AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 05/07/2019 11:39, Thomas Monjalon: > > > 05/07/2019 11:38, Thomas Monjalon: > > > > 05/07/2019 11:35, Bruce Richardson: > > > > > On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 10:33:59AM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: >

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/2] standardize rawdev names

2019-07-30 Thread Neil Horman
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:17:46AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 05/07/2019 11:39, Thomas Monjalon: > > 05/07/2019 11:38, Thomas Monjalon: > > > 05/07/2019 11:35, Bruce Richardson: > > > > On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 10:33:59AM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > > > > The names of the rawdev drivers

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/2] standardize rawdev names

2019-07-30 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:17:46AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 05/07/2019 11:39, Thomas Monjalon: > > 05/07/2019 11:38, Thomas Monjalon: > > > 05/07/2019 11:35, Bruce Richardson: > > > > On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 10:33:59AM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > > > > The names of the rawdev drivers

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/2] standardize rawdev names

2019-07-30 Thread Thomas Monjalon
05/07/2019 11:39, Thomas Monjalon: > 05/07/2019 11:38, Thomas Monjalon: > > 05/07/2019 11:35, Bruce Richardson: > > > On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 10:33:59AM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > > > The names of the rawdev drivers and the resultant libraries they built > > > > were pretty inconsistent. In

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/2] standardize rawdev names

2019-07-05 Thread Thomas Monjalon
05/07/2019 11:38, Thomas Monjalon: > 05/07/2019 11:35, Bruce Richardson: > > On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 10:33:59AM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > > The names of the rawdev drivers and the resultant libraries they built > > > were pretty inconsistent. In terms of directory names, some had "rawdev"

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/2] standardize rawdev names

2019-07-05 Thread Thomas Monjalon
05/07/2019 11:35, Bruce Richardson: > On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 10:33:59AM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > The names of the rawdev drivers and the resultant libraries they built > > were pretty inconsistent. In terms of directory names, some had "rawdev" > > in the name, e.g. skeleton_rawdev, ifpg

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/2] standardize rawdev names

2019-07-05 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 10:33:59AM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: > The names of the rawdev drivers and the resultant libraries they built > were pretty inconsistent. In terms of directory names, some had "rawdev" > in the name, e.g. skeleton_rawdev, ifpga_rawdev, while others didn't. > Also, for t

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/2] standardize rawdev names

2019-07-05 Thread Bruce Richardson
The names of the rawdev drivers and the resultant libraries they built were pretty inconsistent. In terms of directory names, some had "rawdev" in the name, e.g. skeleton_rawdev, ifpga_rawdev, while others didn't. Also, for the built .so/.a libraries, the names were not always consistent between ma