On Friday 06 October 2017 12:54 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 06/10/2017 05:04, santosh:
>> Thomas,
>>
>> You comment is annoying and infuriating both.
>> Patch is their for more than 4month, had enough time for you to comment
>> and understand the topic. Thorough review and testing has happened bo
06/10/2017 05:04, santosh:
> Thomas,
>
> You comment is annoying and infuriating both.
> Patch is their for more than 4month, had enough time for you to comment
> and understand the topic. Thorough review and testing has happened both.
>
> NOTE: You have already delayed this series by one release
Thomas,
You comment is annoying and infuriating both.
Patch is their for more than 4month, had enough time for you to comment
and understand the topic. Thorough review and testing has happened both.
NOTE: You have already delayed this series by one release and
I'm guessing that you intent to push
This patch is introducing a new abstraction.
It is important to explain it for future readers of this code.
20/09/2017 13:23, Santosh Shukla:
> +/**
> + * IOVA mapping mode.
> + */
Please explain what IOVA means and what is the purpose of
distinguish the different modes.
> +enum rte_iova_mode {
On 20-Sep-17 12:23 PM, Santosh Shukla wrote:
Introducing rte_pci_get_iommu_class API which helps to get iommu class
of PCI device on the bus and returns preferred iova mapping mode for
PCI bus.
Patch also adds rte_pci_get_iommu_class definition for:
- bsdapp: api returns default iova mode.
- lin
Introducing rte_pci_get_iommu_class API which helps to get iommu class
of PCI device on the bus and returns preferred iova mapping mode for
PCI bus.
Patch also adds rte_pci_get_iommu_class definition for:
- bsdapp: api returns default iova mode.
- linuxapp: Has stub implementation, Followup patch
6 matches
Mail list logo