Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/5] ethdev: update modify field flow action

2021-10-14 Thread Slava Ovsiienko
ay, October 14, 2021 15:09 > To: Slava Ovsiienko ; dev@dpdk.org > Cc: Raslan Darawsheh ; Matan Azrad > ; Shahaf Shuler ; Ori Kam > ; Gregory Etelson ; NBU-Contact- > Thomas Monjalon > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/5] ethdev: update modify field flow > action > > On

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/5] ethdev: update modify field flow action

2021-10-14 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 10/13/2021 7:45 PM, Viacheslav Ovsiienko wrote: The generic modify field flow action introduced in [1] has some issues related to the immediate source operand: - immediate source can be presented either as an unsigned 64-bit integer or pointer to data pattern in memory. There was

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/5] ethdev: update modify field flow action

2021-10-13 Thread Viacheslav Ovsiienko
The generic modify field flow action introduced in [1] has some issues related to the immediate source operand: - immediate source can be presented either as an unsigned 64-bit integer or pointer to data pattern in memory. There was no explicit pointer field defined in the union. - th