On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 04:39:34PM +0100, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
> On 27-Apr-18 4:18 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 10:56:42AM +0100, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
> > > We close fd if we managed to find it in the list of allocated
> > > segment lists (which should always be the
On 27-Apr-18 4:18 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 10:56:42AM +0100, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
We close fd if we managed to find it in the list of allocated
segment lists (which should always be the case under normal
conditions), but if we didn't, the fd was leaking. Close it if
On 27-Apr-18 4:18 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 10:56:42AM +0100, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
We close fd if we managed to find it in the list of allocated
segment lists (which should always be the case under normal
conditions), but if we didn't, the fd was leaking. Close it if
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 10:56:42AM +0100, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
> We close fd if we managed to find it in the list of allocated
> segment lists (which should always be the case under normal
> conditions), but if we didn't, the fd was leaking. Close it if
> we couldn't find it in the segment list.
We close fd if we managed to find it in the list of allocated
segment lists (which should always be the case under normal
conditions), but if we didn't, the fd was leaking. Close it if
we couldn't find it in the segment list. This is not an issue
as if the segment is zero length, we're getting rid
5 matches
Mail list logo