On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 3:49 PM Liang Ma wrote:
>
> Add two new power management intrinsics, and provide an implementation
> in eal/x86 based on UMONITOR/UMWAIT instructions. The instructions
> are implemented as raw byte opcodes because there is not yet widespread
> compiler support for these inst
On 04 Sep 11:42, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
we have discussed with arm developer in the past.
Please ref https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/70662/
There was no objection, in my opinoin.
Also the API we proposed has experimental tag, other vendor still can change it.
For the ethdev internal ops we int
On 04 Sep 11:42, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
we are very open to discuss design with other vendor.
> Before this is merged, please work with Arm maintainers to have a version that
> works on Arm 64 as well. Don't think this should be merged unless the two
> major
> platforms supported by DPDK can w
Hi Stephen,
v4 patch will include the l3fwd-power udpate.
Regards
Liang
On 04 Sep 09:37, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 11:18:55 +0100
> Liang Ma wrote:
>
> > Add two new power management intrinsics, and provide an implementation
> > in eal/x86 based on UMONITOR/UMWAIT instru
Hi Stephen,
Agree. v4 will address this.
Regards
Liang
On 04 Sep 09:23, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 11:18:55 +0100
> Liang Ma wrote:
>
> > + *
> > + * @return
> > + * Architecture-dependent return value.
> > + */
> > +static inline int rte_power_monitor(const volatile voi
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/x86/include/rte_power_intrinsics.h
> b/lib/librte_eal/x86/include/rte_power_intrinsics.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 00..6dd1cdc939
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/x86/include/rte_power_intrinsics.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier
On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 11:18:55 +0100
Liang Ma wrote:
> Add two new power management intrinsics, and provide an implementation
> in eal/x86 based on UMONITOR/UMWAIT instructions. The instructions
> are implemented as raw byte opcodes because there is not yet widespread
> compiler support for these i
On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 11:18:55 +0100
Liang Ma wrote:
> Add two new power management intrinsics, and provide an implementation
> in eal/x86 based on UMONITOR/UMWAIT instructions. The instructions
> are implemented as raw byte opcodes because there is not yet widespread
> compiler support for these i
On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 11:18:55 +0100
Liang Ma wrote:
> + *
> + * @return
> + * Architecture-dependent return value.
> + */
> +static inline int rte_power_monitor(const volatile void *p,
> + const uint64_t expected_value, const uint64_t value_mask,
> + const uint32_t state,
Add two new power management intrinsics, and provide an implementation
in eal/x86 based on UMONITOR/UMWAIT instructions. The instructions
are implemented as raw byte opcodes because there is not yet widespread
compiler support for these instructions.
The power management instructions provide an ar
10 matches
Mail list logo
