On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 8:00 PM Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > I'm incredibly frustrated with this whole process to be honest...
>
> Please don't be so, you are spending time/effort to improve an open source
> project which is great, thank you again.
>
> Why don't we take this as incremental steps, first
On 10/10/2018 4:01 PM, Dan Gora wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 11:16 AM Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>>
>> On 9/27/2018 1:32 AM, Dan Gora wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Attached is version 3 of a patchset to add a new API function to
>>> set the link status on kernel interfaces created with the KNI kernel
>>
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 11:16 AM Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>
> On 9/27/2018 1:32 AM, Dan Gora wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Attached is version 3 of a patchset to add a new API function to
> > set the link status on kernel interfaces created with the KNI kernel
> > module.
> >
> > v3
> >
> > * Use sep
On 9/27/2018 1:32 AM, Dan Gora wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Attached is version 3 of a patchset to add a new API function to
> set the link status on kernel interfaces created with the KNI kernel
> module.
>
> v3
>
> * Use separate function to test rte_kni_update_link() in 'test' app.
>
> * Separat
Hi All,
Attached is version 3 of a patchset to add a new API function to
set the link status on kernel interfaces created with the KNI kernel
module.
v3
* Use separate function to test rte_kni_update_link() in 'test' app.
* Separate changes to 'test' app into separate patch to facilitate
5 matches
Mail list logo
