On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 8:00 PM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com> wrote: > > I'm incredibly frustrated with this whole process to be honest... > > Please don't be so, you are spending time/effort to improve an open source > project which is great, thank you again. > > Why don't we take this as incremental steps, first get agreed part in a > patchset. 4/6 doesn't fit this but I can implement the command line part for > you > if you agree, what do you think?
I can work on it, but it might take a couple of days until I have time. What do you think about my proposal for patch 1/4? (see the end of 'Message-ID: <cagyogrzjmawgxx0kxk+k69rbdbrqejgs0h_vw8h43-qfq_p...@mail.gmail.com>', 4 emails back in this thread..) I can make it work without the log message in the API function, but I need some way to get the previous status. See my proposals in that email above.. d
