> -Original Message-
> From: Olivier Matz [mailto:olivier.m...@6wind.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 6, 2017 6:27 PM
> To: Wu, Jingjing
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Zhang, Helin ; Ananyev,
> Konstantin ; Yigit, Ferruh
>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] net/i40e:
> -Original Message-
> From: Olivier Matz [mailto:olivier.m...@6wind.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 6, 2017 6:29 PM
> To: Wu, Jingjing
> Cc: Yigit, Ferruh ; dev@dpdk.org; Zhang, Helin
>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] net/i40e: fix bitmask of supported Tx
&
On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 03:02:12 +, "Wu, Jingjing"
wrote:
> >
> > Functionally will be same, but what do you think about following,
> > to make easy to see what define adds:
> >
> > +#define I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK ( \
> > + PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM |\
> > + PKT_TX_IP
Hi Jingjing,
On Sat, 4 Feb 2017 11:36:12 +0800, Jingjing Wu
wrote:
> Some Tx offload flags are missed in bitmask of all supported packet
> Tx flags by i40e.
> This patch fixes it.
Could you detail which flag was missing?
Is it PKT_TX_TUNNEL_MASK?
If yes, shouldn't we have a "Fixes:" line?
I th
>
> Functionally will be same, but what do you think about following, to make
> easy to see what define adds:
>
> +#define I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK (\
> + PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM |\
> + PKT_TX_IPV4 |\
> + PKT_TX_IPV6 |\
> +
On 2/4/2017 3:36 AM, Jingjing Wu wrote:
> Some Tx offload flags are missed in bitmask of all supported packet
> Tx flags by i40e.
> This patch fixes it.
>
> CC: helin.zh...@intel.com
> Fixes: 3f33e643e5c6 ("net/i40e: add Tx preparation")
> Signed-off-by: Jingjing Wu
> ---
> drivers/net/i40e/i40e
Some Tx offload flags are missed in bitmask of all supported packet
Tx flags by i40e.
This patch fixes it.
CC: helin.zh...@intel.com
Fixes: 3f33e643e5c6 ("net/i40e: add Tx preparation")
Signed-off-by: Jingjing Wu
---
drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c | 36
1 file
7 matches
Mail list logo
