Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] timer: add per-installer pending lists for each lcore

and process them, as in the current patch. Thoughts or comments? Thanks, Gabriel > -Original Message- > From: Ananyev, Konstantin > Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 5:57 AM > To: Carrillo, Erik G ; rsanf...@akamai.com > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] timer: add per-installer pending lists for each lcore

Hi Konstantin, > -Original Message- > From: Ananyev, Konstantin > Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 5:57 AM > To: Carrillo, Erik G ; rsanf...@akamai.com > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] timer: add per-installer pending lists > for each

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] timer: add per-installer pending lists for each lcore

Hi Gabriel, > > Instead of each priv_timer struct containing a single skiplist, this > commit adds a skiplist for each enabled lcore to priv_timer. In the case > that multiple lcores repeatedly install timers on the same target lcore, > this change reduces lock contention for the target lcore's s

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] timer: add per-installer pending lists for each lcore

Instead of each priv_timer struct containing a single skiplist, this commit adds a skiplist for each enabled lcore to priv_timer. In the case that multiple lcores repeatedly install timers on the same target lcore, this change reduces lock contention for the target lcore's skiplists and increases p