On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 8:21 PM Ye Xiaolong wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 06/11, William Tu wrote:
> [snip]
> >> @@ -294,16 +326,26 @@ eth_af_xdp_tx(void *queue, struct rte_mbuf **bufs,
> >> uint16_t nb_pkts)
> >>
> >> desc = xsk_ring_prod__tx_desc(&txq->tx, idx_tx + i);
> >>
Hi,
On 06/11, William Tu wrote:
[snip]
>> @@ -294,16 +326,26 @@ eth_af_xdp_tx(void *queue, struct rte_mbuf **bufs,
>> uint16_t nb_pkts)
>>
>> desc = xsk_ring_prod__tx_desc(&txq->tx, idx_tx + i);
>> mbuf = bufs[i];
>> -
>> - desc->addr = (uint64_t)add
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 2:16 AM Xiaolong Ye wrote:
>
> Implement zero copy of af_xdp pmd through mbuf's external memory
> mechanism to achieve high performance.
>
> This patch also provides a new parameter "pmd_zero_copy" for user, so they
> can choose to enable zero copy of af_xdp pmd or not.
>
>
On 05/30, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>On Thu, 30 May 2019 17:07:05 +0800
>Xiaolong Ye wrote:
>
>> Implement zero copy of af_xdp pmd through mbuf's external memory
>> mechanism to achieve high performance.
>>
>> This patch also provides a new parameter "pmd_zero_copy" for user, so they
>> can choose
On Thu, 30 May 2019 17:07:05 +0800
Xiaolong Ye wrote:
> Implement zero copy of af_xdp pmd through mbuf's external memory
> mechanism to achieve high performance.
>
> This patch also provides a new parameter "pmd_zero_copy" for user, so they
> can choose to enable zero copy of af_xdp pmd or not.
Implement zero copy of af_xdp pmd through mbuf's external memory
mechanism to achieve high performance.
This patch also provides a new parameter "pmd_zero_copy" for user, so they
can choose to enable zero copy of af_xdp pmd or not.
To be clear, "zero copy" here is different from the "zero copy mo
6 matches
Mail list logo