On Thu, 30 May 2019 17:07:05 +0800 Xiaolong Ye <xiaolong...@intel.com> wrote:
> Implement zero copy of af_xdp pmd through mbuf's external memory > mechanism to achieve high performance. > > This patch also provides a new parameter "pmd_zero_copy" for user, so they > can choose to enable zero copy of af_xdp pmd or not. > > To be clear, "zero copy" here is different from the "zero copy mode" of > AF_XDP, it is about zero copy between af_xdp umem and mbuf used in dpdk > application. > > Suggested-by: Varghese Vipin <vipin.vargh...@intel.com> > Suggested-by: Tummala Sivaprasad <sivaprasad.tumm...@intel.com> > Suggested-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.m...@6wind.com> > Signed-off-by: Xiaolong Ye <xiaolong...@intel.com> Why is this a parameter? Can it just be auto detected. Remember configuration is evil, it hurts usability, code coverage and increases complexity.
