[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] recipes for RPM packages

2014-05-01 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2014-05-01 09:14, Neil Horman: > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 02:46:41AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > The goal of this patch serie is to be able to package DPDK > > for RPM-based distributions. > > > > The file naming currently doesn't allow to install different DPDK > > versions. > > But the pack

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] recipes for RPM packages

2014-05-01 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2014-05-01 06:28, Neil Horman: > On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 08:53:02AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 2014-04-30 11:22, Neil Horman: > > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 01:09:38PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > The 4 spec files are used to build 4 different git trees with their > > > > own > > > >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] recipes for RPM packages

2014-05-01 Thread Neil Horman
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 02:46:41AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > The goal of this patch serie is to be able to package DPDK > for RPM-based distributions. > > The file naming currently doesn't allow to install different DPDK versions. > But the packaging naming should be ready to manage differen

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] recipes for RPM packages

2014-05-01 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2014-04-30 11:22, Neil Horman: > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 01:09:38PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > The 4 spec files are used to build 4 different git trees with their own > > versioning: > > http://dpdk.org/browse > > > > So I think it's saner to keep them in their repository. [...] > > Ye

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] recipes for RPM packages

2014-05-01 Thread Neil Horman
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 08:53:02AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2014-04-30 11:22, Neil Horman: > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 01:09:38PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > The 4 spec files are used to build 4 different git trees with their own > > > versioning: > > > http://dpdk.org/browse > > >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] recipes for RPM packages

2014-04-30 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2014-04-30 06:52, Neil Horman: > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 02:46:41AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > The goal of this patch serie is to be able to package DPDK > > for RPM-based distributions. > > You should merge these into a single spec file so that you only have to > build once. That also cle

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] recipes for RPM packages

2014-04-30 Thread Neil Horman
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 01:09:38PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2014-04-30 06:52, Neil Horman: > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 02:46:41AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > The goal of this patch serie is to be able to package DPDK > > > for RPM-based distributions. > > > > You should merge these

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] recipes for RPM packages

2014-04-30 Thread Neil Horman
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 02:46:41AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > The goal of this patch serie is to be able to package DPDK > for RPM-based distributions. > > The file naming currently doesn't allow to install different DPDK versions. > But the packaging naming should be ready to manage differen

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] recipes for RPM packages

2014-04-30 Thread Thomas Monjalon
The goal of this patch serie is to be able to package DPDK for RPM-based distributions. The file naming currently doesn't allow to install different DPDK versions. But the packaging naming should be ready to manage different DPDK versions having different API/ABI for different applications: