2014-05-01 09:14, Neil Horman: > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 02:46:41AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > The goal of this patch serie is to be able to package DPDK > > for RPM-based distributions. > > > > The file naming currently doesn't allow to install different DPDK > > versions. > > But the packaging naming should be ready to manage different DPDK versions > > > > having different API/ABI for different applications: > > - dpdk-core has full version in its name to manage API breaking > > - extensions have a number as name suffix to manage PMD API breaking. > > > > When API/ABI will be stable, package names could be simpler. > > > > I suggest to add these .spec files as a starting point for integration > > in Linux distributions. > > > > Changes since v1: > > - name of .spec file match package name > > - version in package name > > - no static library > > - ldconfig/depmod in scriplets > > > > Thanks for your comments/reviews. > > I understand that this is holding up the 1.6.0r2 release, as well as the > 1.7.0 integration. As such, given that my concerns, while valid IMO, > aren't required for the release: > > Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman at tuxdriver.com>
Applied for dpdk-1.6.0r2, memnic-1.1, vmxnet3-usermap 1.2 and virtio-net-pmd-1.2. Thanks Neil and other RedHat people for helping in this first step. -- Thomas
