ng
>
>
>
> *From:* Vladimir Medvedkin [mailto:medvedkinv at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Saturday, June 14, 2014 12:19 AM
> *To:* Wu, Jingjing
> *Cc:* Thomas Monjalon; dev at dpdk.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] NIC filters support for generic
> filter
>
>
.
Thank you!
Jingjing
From: Vladimir Medvedkin [mailto:medvedk...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2014 12:19 AM
To: Wu, Jingjing
Cc: Thomas Monjalon; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] NIC filters support for generic filter
Hi Jingjing,
Yes, I agree.
I have one more remark. It
your agree my proposal?
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Vladimir Medvedkin [mailto:medvedkinv at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, June 13, 2014 7:52 PM
> *To:* Thomas Monjalon
> *Cc:* Wu, Jingjing; dev at dpdk.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] NIC filters support for ge
Hi all,
The 82599 datasheet (p. 284 and p.287) has only recommendations and only
when possible about assign rx queue not used by RSS/DCB. I do not see any
serious restrictions do not assign the rx queue used by RSS/DCB.
For cases with only 1 queue if I understand correctly this patch
http://dpdk.o
it and integrate the change to patch in
new version.
Do your agree my proposal?
From: Vladimir Medvedkin [mailto:medvedk...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2014 7:52 PM
To: Thomas Monjalon
Cc: Wu, Jingjing; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] NIC filters support for
> 2014-06-11 17:45, Thomas Monjalon:
> > My main concern is that Vladimir Medvedkin suggested another API and I'd
> > like you give your opinion about it:
> > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-June/003053.html
> > It offers pool number in configuration of the filters.
2014-06-12 08:
1:45 PM
To: Wu, Jingjing
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Vladimir Medvedkin
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] NIC filters support for generic filter
Hi Jingjing,
Please reply below the question.
2014-05-28 01:12, Wu, Jingjing:
> You are discussing whether the APIs provide for NIC filters is generic
&g
Hi Jingjing,
Please reply below the question.
2014-05-28 01:12, Wu, Jingjing:
> You are discussing whether the APIs provide for NIC filters is generic
> or not. About that we can use same API for a type of filter. For example,
> if we want to configure ethertype filter, we can use the same API, n
Tested-by: Waterman Cao
This patch includes 4 files, and has been tested by Intel.
Please see information as the following:
Fedora 20 x86_64, Linux Kernel 3.11.10-301, GCC 4.8.2
Intel Xeon CPU E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz
NIC: Intel Niantic 82599, Intel i350, Intel 82580 and Intel 82576
We verified e
Hi Jingjing,
2014-05-24 09:37, Jingjing Wu:
> A generic filter mechanism for handling special packet is required.
> It will allow filters to be set in HW when available so that specific
> packet may be filtered by NICs to specific descriptor queues for
> processing. Currently only Flow Director fo
esday, May 28, 2014 7:22 AM
To: Wu, Jingjing
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] NIC filters support for generic filter
Hi Jingjing,
2014-05-24 09:37, Jingjing Wu:
> A generic filter mechanism for handling special packet is required.
> It will allow filters to b
ng
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] NIC filters support for generic filter
Hi Jingjing,
2014-05-24 09:37, Jingjing Wu:
> A generic filter mechanism for handling special packet is required.
> It will allow filters to be set in HW when available so that specific
--- the v2 patchset changes:
--- add NIC filter support for 82576
--- rework for code rule warning if using git apply to apply patch
A generic filter mechanism for handling special packet is required.
It will allow filters to be set in HW when available so that specific
packet may be filtered by N
13 matches
Mail list logo
