Hi Olivier,
On 1/16/2018 7:21 PM, Olivier Matz wrote:
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 09:48:01PM +0530, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
On 12/22/2017 7:29 PM, Olivier MATZ wrote:
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 05:29:59PM +0530, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
On 12/19/2017 6:38 PM, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
That's true, I comme
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 09:48:01PM +0530, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
> On 12/22/2017 7:29 PM, Olivier MATZ wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 05:29:59PM +0530, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
> > > On 12/19/2017 6:38 PM, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > That's true, I commented too fast :)
> > > > > And w
On Tuesday 19 December 2017 04:32 PM, Olivier MATZ wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 04:16:33PM +0530, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
>> Hi Olivier,
>>
>> On 12/19/2017 3:54 PM, Olivier MATZ wrote:
>>> Hi Hemant,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 06:01:12PM +0530, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
This is required f
On 12/22/2017 7:29 PM, Olivier MATZ wrote:
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 05:29:59PM +0530, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
On 12/19/2017 6:38 PM, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
That's true, I commented too fast :)
And what about using mp->nb_mem_chunks instead? Would it do the job
in your use-case?
It should work.
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 05:29:59PM +0530, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
> On 12/19/2017 6:38 PM, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
> >
> > > That's true, I commented too fast :)
> > > And what about using mp->nb_mem_chunks instead? Would it do the job
> > > in your use-case?
> >
> > It should work. Let me check it
On 12/19/2017 6:38 PM, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
That's true, I commented too fast :)
And what about using mp->nb_mem_chunks instead? Would it do the job
in your use-case?
It should work. Let me check it out.
There is a slight problem with nb_mem_chunks.
It is getting incremented in the end o
That's true, I commented too fast :)
And what about using mp->nb_mem_chunks instead? Would it do the job
in your use-case?
It should work. Let me check it out.
Thanks
Regards,
Hemant
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 04:16:33PM +0530, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
> Hi Olivier,
>
> On 12/19/2017 3:54 PM, Olivier MATZ wrote:
> > Hi Hemant,
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 06:01:12PM +0530, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
> > > This is required for the optimizations w.r.t hw mempools.
> > > They will use d
Hi Olivier,
On 12/19/2017 3:54 PM, Olivier MATZ wrote:
Hi Hemant,
On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 06:01:12PM +0530, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
This is required for the optimizations w.r.t hw mempools.
They will use different kind of optimizations if the buffers
are from single contiguous memzone.
Signed-o
Hi Hemant,
On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 06:01:12PM +0530, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
> This is required for the optimizations w.r.t hw mempools.
> They will use different kind of optimizations if the buffers
> are from single contiguous memzone.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal
> ---
> lib/librte_mempoo
This is required for the optimizations w.r.t hw mempools.
They will use different kind of optimizations if the buffers
are from single contiguous memzone.
Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal
---
lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.c | 7 +--
lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h | 5 +
2 files changed,
11 matches
Mail list logo
