On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 05:29:59PM +0530, Hemant Agrawal wrote: > On 12/19/2017 6:38 PM, Hemant Agrawal wrote: > > > > > That's true, I commented too fast :) > > > And what about using mp->nb_mem_chunks instead? Would it do the job > > > in your use-case? > > > > It should work. Let me check it out. > > There is a slight problem with nb_mem_chunks. > > It is getting incremented in the end of "rte_mempool_populate_phys", > while the elements are getting populated before it in the call of > mempool_add_elem. > > I can use nb_mem_chunks are '0' check. However it can break in future if > mempool_populate_phys changes.
Sorry, I'm not sure I'm getting what you say. My question was about using mp->nb_mem_chunks instead of a new flag in the dppa driver. Am I missing something?
