On 3/15/21 10:27 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Posix mutex are not by default safe for protecting for usage
> from multiple processes. The flow ops mutex could be used by
> both primary and secondary processes.
>
> Bugzilla ID: 662
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger
> Fixes: 80d1a9aff7f6 ("ethde
19/04/2021 19:45, Stephen Hemminger:
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 19:14:08 +0200
> Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > The compilation fails on MinGW:
> > error: implicit declaration of function ‘pthread_mutexattr_init’
>
> Sorry, don't have all the variants. How do you handle the lack of
> compatibility on Wind
On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 19:14:08 +0200
Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> About the title, better to say "multi-process" and do not
> commit on being completely safe for the whole API.
> It is just fixing the mutex for multi-process,
> and this mutex is for driver not being natively multi-thread.
>
> The comp
About the title, better to say "multi-process" and do not
commit on being completely safe for the whole API.
It is just fixing the mutex for multi-process,
and this mutex is for driver not being natively multi-thread.
The compilation fails on MinGW:
error: implicit declaration of function ‘pthread
On 3/15/2021 7:27 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
Posix mutex are not by default safe for protecting for usage
from multiple processes. The flow ops mutex could be used by
both primary and secondary processes.
Bugzilla ID: 662
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger
Fixes: 80d1a9aff7f6 ("ethdev: make flo
On 4/16/2021 2:41 AM, fengchengwen wrote:
We make a test on this patch, test result show that it works fine. Below is the
detail:
HW: Kunpeng920 ARM Platform which is ARMv8
NIC: Kunpeng920 SOC NIC
OS: Linux centos-C3 5.12.0-rc4+
DPDK: 21.02
DRV: hns3
Start three process:
./testpmd -w :bd:0
; Ori Kam ;
> >> Andrew Rybchenko ; NBU-Contact-Thomas
> >> Monjalon
> >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Stephen Hemminger
> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: make flow API primary/secondary
> >> process safe
> >>
> >> On 3/16/2021 1
We make a test on this patch, test result show that it works fine. Below is the
detail:
HW: Kunpeng920 ARM Platform which is ARMv8
NIC: Kunpeng920 SOC NIC
OS: Linux centos-C3 5.12.0-rc4+
DPDK: 21.02
DRV: hns3
Start three process:
./testpmd -w :bd:00.0 -l 67-68 --proc-type=auto -- -i --num-pr
nath Kotur
>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: make flow API primary/secondary
> process safe
>
> On 4/15/2021 3:55 AM, Suanming Mou wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Ferruh Yigit
> >> Sent: Wednesda
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 08:42:39 +0100
Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > (If I understand correctly, mlx PMD level now should support multi-process,
> > but better to have the confirmation from maintainers with much deeper
> > level).
> > I assume this patch solves the posix mutex for multi-process only, har
: make flow API primary/secondary
process safe
On 3/16/2021 11:48 PM, Suanming Mou wrote:
Hi Stephen,
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Hemminger
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 3:27 AM
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Stephen Hemminger ; Suanming Mou
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: make flow API primary
n
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Stephen Hemminger
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: make flow API primary/secondary
> > process safe
> >
> > On 3/16/2021 11:48 PM, Suanming Mou wrote:
> > > Hi Stephen,
> > >
> > >> -Original Me
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Ferruh Yigit
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 9:07 PM
> To: Suanming Mou ; Ori Kam ;
> Andrew Rybchenko ; NBU-Contact-Thomas
> Monjalon
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Stephen Hemminger
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: make fl
On 3/16/2021 11:48 PM, Suanming Mou wrote:
Hi Stephen,
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Hemminger
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 3:27 AM
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Stephen Hemminger ; Suanming Mou
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: make flow API primary/secondary process safe
Posix mutex are not
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Hemminger
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 8:14 AM
> To: Suanming Mou
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: make flow API primary/secondary process safe
>
> On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 23:48:57 +
> Suanming Mou wrote:
>
> > Hi Stephe
On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 23:48:57 +
Suanming Mou wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Stephen Hemminger
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 3:27 AM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Stephen Hemminger ; Suanming Mou
> >
> > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: make flow API primary/s
Hi Stephen,
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Hemminger
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 3:27 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Stephen Hemminger ; Suanming Mou
>
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: make flow API primary/secondary process safe
>
> Posix mutex are not by default safe for protecti
Posix mutex are not by default safe for protecting for usage
from multiple processes. The flow ops mutex could be used by
both primary and secondary processes.
Bugzilla ID: 662
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger
Fixes: 80d1a9aff7f6 ("ethdev: make flow API thread safe")
Cc: suanmi...@nvidia.com
---
18 matches
Mail list logo
