Hi Stephen, > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 3:27 AM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Cc: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org>; Suanming Mou > <suanmi...@nvidia.com> > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: make flow API primary/secondary process safe > > Posix mutex are not by default safe for protecting for usage from multiple > processes. The flow ops mutex could be used by both primary and secondary > processes.
Process safe is something more widely scope. I assume it should be another feature but not a bugfix for thread-safe? And the fag RTE_ETH_DEV_FLOW_OPS_THREAD_SAFE we have added is just thread safe. > > Bugzilla ID: 662 > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org> > Fixes: 80d1a9aff7f6 ("ethdev: make flow API thread safe") > Cc: suanmi...@nvidia.com > --- > lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c | 6 +++++- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c > index > 6f514c388b4e..d1024df408a5 100644 > --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c > +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c > @@ -470,6 +470,7 @@ rte_eth_dev_allocate(const char *name) { > uint16_t port_id; > struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev = NULL; > + pthread_mutexattr_t attr; > size_t name_len; > > name_len = strnlen(name, RTE_ETH_NAME_MAX_LEN); @@ -506,7 > +507,10 @@ rte_eth_dev_allocate(const char *name) > strlcpy(eth_dev->data->name, name, sizeof(eth_dev->data->name)); > eth_dev->data->port_id = port_id; > eth_dev->data->mtu = RTE_ETHER_MTU; > - pthread_mutex_init(ð_dev->data->flow_ops_mutex, NULL); > + > + pthread_mutexattr_init(&attr); > + pthread_mutexattr_setpshared(&attr, PTHREAD_PROCESS_SHARED); > > + pthread_mutex_init(ð_dev->data->flow_ops_mutex, &attr); > > unlock: > rte_spinlock_unlock(ð_dev_shared_data->ownership_lock); > -- > 2.30.2