Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2018-11-16 Thread Bruce Richardson
> > is missing tailqs > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com] > > > > > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 8:41

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2018-11-16 Thread Bruce Richardson
Anatoly; dev@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is > missing tailqs > > > Bumping the minimum version would be really nice generally for DPDK, but I > > don't think this is the point in the release cycle to do so. I ne

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2018-11-15 Thread Luca Boccassi
> > From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com] > > > > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 8:41 AM > > > > To: Burdick, Cliff > > > > Cc: Luca Boccassi; Thomas Monjalon; Burakov, Anatoly; dev@dpdk. > > > > org > > > > Subje

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2018-11-15 Thread Burdick, Cliff
nt: Thursday, November 15, 2018 4:55 PM > > > > To: Richardson, Bruce > > > > Cc: Luca Boccassi ; Thomas Monjalon > > > > ; Burakov, Anatoly > > > > ; > > > > dev@dpdk.org > > > > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal:

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2018-11-15 Thread Bruce Richardson
PM > > > To: Richardson, Bruce > > > Cc: Luca Boccassi ; Thomas Monjalon > > > ; Burakov, Anatoly > > > ; > > > dev@dpdk.org > > > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if > > > primary > >

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2018-11-15 Thread Luca Boccassi
onjalon > > ; Burakov, Anatoly > > ; > > dev@dpdk.org > > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if > > primary > > is missing tailqs > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:br

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2018-11-15 Thread Richardson, Bruce
Luca Boccassi [mailto:bl...@debian.org] > > > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 1:33 AM > > > To: Burdick, Cliff; Bruce Richardson > > > Cc: Thomas Monjalon; Burakov, Anatoly; dev@dpdk.org > > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail seco

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2018-11-15 Thread Burdick, Cliff
on > > Cc: Thomas Monjalon; Burakov, Anatoly; dev@dpdk.org > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if > > primary is missing tailqs > > > > > On Wed, 2018-11-14 at 18:24 +, Burdick, Cliff wrote: > > > > > &g

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2018-11-15 Thread Bruce Richardson
pdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is > missing tailqs > > > On Wed, 2018-11-14 at 18:24 +, Burdick, Cliff wrote: > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Luca Boccassi [mailto:bl...@de

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2018-11-15 Thread Burdick, Cliff
-Original Message- From: Luca Boccassi [mailto:bl...@debian.org] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 1:33 AM To: Burdick, Cliff; Bruce Richardson Cc: Thomas Monjalon; Burakov, Anatoly; dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing t

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2018-11-15 Thread Luca Boccassi
el.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 3:48 AM > > > To: Burdick, Cliff > > > Cc: Thomas Monjalon; Burakov, Anatoly; dev@dpdk.org > > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if  &

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2018-11-14 Thread Burdick, Cliff
; Burakov, Anatoly; dev@dpdk.org > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if > > primary is missing tailqs > > > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 11:42:51PM +, Burdick, Cliff wrote: > > > > > > > > _

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2018-11-14 Thread Luca Boccassi
n.net] > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2018 2:18 PM > > > To: Burdick, Cliff > > > Cc: Burakov, Anatoly; dev@dpdk.org; bruce.richard...@intel.com > > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if  > > > primary is missing

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2018-11-14 Thread Burdick, Cliff
-Original Message- From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 3:48 AM To: Burdick, Cliff Cc: Thomas Monjalon; Burakov, Anatoly; dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing t

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2018-11-14 Thread Bruce Richardson
.com > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is > missing tailqs > > 13/11/2018 23:08, Burdick, Cliff: > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net] > > > 13/11/2018 17:38, Burdick, Cliff: > > > > From: Thomas

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2018-11-13 Thread Burdick, Cliff
From: Thomas Monjalon [tho...@monjalon.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2018 2:18 PM To: Burdick, Cliff Cc: Burakov, Anatoly; dev@dpdk.org; bruce.richard...@intel.com Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is mi

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2018-11-13 Thread Thomas Monjalon
13/11/2018 23:08, Burdick, Cliff: > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net] > > 13/11/2018 17:38, Burdick, Cliff: > > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net] > > > 13/11/2018 16:45, Burdick, Cliff: > > > > From: Burakov, Anatoly [mailto:anatoly.bura...@intel.com] > > > > >

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2018-11-13 Thread Burdick, Cliff
-Original Message- From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2018 8:44 AM To: Burdick, Cliff Cc: Burakov, Anatoly; dev@dpdk.org; bruce.richard...@intel.com Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing t

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2018-11-13 Thread Thomas Monjalon
13/11/2018 17:38, Burdick, Cliff: > > -Original Message- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net] > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2018 8:07 AM > To: Burdick, Cliff > Cc: Burakov, Anatoly; dev@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fa

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2018-11-13 Thread Burdick, Cliff
-Original Message- From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2018 8:07 AM To: Burdick, Cliff Cc: Burakov, Anatoly; dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs 13/11/2018 16:45, Bu

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2018-11-13 Thread Thomas Monjalon
13/11/2018 16:45, Burdick, Cliff: > From: Burakov, Anatoly [mailto:anatoly.bura...@intel.com] > > On 13-Nov-18 9:21 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > 13/11/2018 00:33, Burdick, Cliff: > > >> This patch was submitted by Jean Tourrilhes over two years ago, but > > >> didn't receive any responses. I h

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2018-11-13 Thread Burdick, Cliff
-Original Message- From: Burakov, Anatoly [mailto:anatoly.bura...@intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2018 1:39 AM To: Thomas Monjalon; Burdick, Cliff Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs On 13-Nov-18 9:

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2018-11-13 Thread Burakov, Anatoly
On 13-Nov-18 9:21 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: 13/11/2018 00:33, Burdick, Cliff: This patch was submitted by Jean Tourrilhes over two years ago, but didn't receive any responses. I hit the same issue recently when trying to use cgo (Golang) as a primary process linked to libdpdk.a against a C++

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2018-11-13 Thread Thomas Monjalon
13/11/2018 00:33, Burdick, Cliff: > This patch was submitted by Jean Tourrilhes over two years ago, but didn't > receive any responses. I hit the same issue recently when trying to use cgo > (Golang) as a primary process linked to libdpdk.a against a C++ application > linked against the same lib

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2018-11-12 Thread Burdick, Cliff
This patch was submitted by Jean Tourrilhes over two years ago, but didn't receive any responses. I hit the same issue recently when trying to use cgo (Golang) as a primary process linked to libdpdk.a against a C++ application linked against the same library. The history of the patch is here: h

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2016-10-05 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2016-10-05 09:49, Jean Tourrilhes: > On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 09:58:01AM +0200, David Marchand wrote: > > I thought you had unaligned binaries. > > You are compiling only one binary ? > > Primary is compiled using the DPDK build process. > Secondary is build using the Snort build proces

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2016-10-05 Thread Jean Tourrilhes
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 07:09:14PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > Probably that you would have some aligned builds if Snort was using > a pkg-config approach to link DPDK. I seriously doubt it, but maybe there is some deep linker magic that would pick the appropriate set of constructor

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2016-10-05 Thread David Marchand
Hello, On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 6:59 PM, Jean Tourrilhes wrote: > On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 02:11:39PM +0100, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote: >> The case you are trying to fix is, as an example, when your secondary app is >> using LPM but your primary is not. >> So basically with this patch, you are re

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2016-10-05 Thread Jean Tourrilhes
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 09:58:01AM +0200, David Marchand wrote: > Hello, Hi there, > I thought you had unaligned binaries. > You are compiling only one binary ? Primary is compiled using the DPDK build process. Secondary is build using the Snort build process. Bot

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2016-10-04 Thread Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
Hi Jean, As with your other patch, commit title needs fixing and also missing Signed-off-by line. On 22/09/2016 22:17, Jean Tourrilhes wrote: > lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_tailqs.c | 15 --- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/co

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2016-10-04 Thread Jean Tourrilhes
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 02:11:39PM +0100, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote: > Hi Jean, > > As with your other patch, commit title needs fixing and also missing > Signed-off-by line. I'll do that, no worries... > I might be missing something here so bear with me. Yes, I know I was te

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2016-09-22 Thread Jean Tourrilhes
lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_tailqs.c | 15 --- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_tailqs.c b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_tailqs.c index bb08ec8..6960d06 100644 --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_tailqs.c +++ b/